Answer:
D. $1 comma 000 billion increase
Explanation:
The reserve requirement ratio determines the total amount of checkable deposits a bank must keep.
In this case the reserve ratio it's 5%, which means that the total amount of deposits cannot exceed an amount equal to 20 times its reserves.
If the reserves increase by $50 billion then $50/0,05 = 1.000 billion increase.
<span>If the investment accelerator from an increase in government purchases is larger than the crowding out effect, then the multiplier is probably greater than one. The crowding out effect within economics is defined as a theory that when public sector spending rises, it can drive down or eliminate private sector </span>spending. Public sector spending is government spending whereas private sector spending is for-profit businesses that aren't owned or operated by the government.
No you can not afford it
1600•0.25= 400
1600-400=1200
1200-1200=0
The income before income taxes is 2024 understated by $1,890 and 2025 overstated by $1,890.
<h3>Income before taxes</h3>
Esquire Company journal entries
June 30, 2024
Debit Note receivable $54,000
Credit Sales $54,000
Dec 31, 2024
Debit Interest receivable $1,890
Credit Interest Income $1,890
($54,000 x 7% x6/12)
March 31, 2025
Debit Cash $56,835
Credit Interest receivable $1,890
Credit Interest income $945
($54000 x 7% x 3/12 )
Credit Note Receivable $54,000
Therefore the income before income taxes is 2024 understated by $1,890 and 2025 overstated by $1,890.
Learn more about Income before taxes here:brainly.com/question/14644556
brainly.com/question/17005057
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is: B) The statement is false. A decrease in the price of digital cameras would decrease the demand for non-digital cameras, but a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would not cause the demand for non-digital cameras to decrease.
Explanation:
Suppose we are not currently living in 2019, instead we are back 12 years to 2007 (before the iPhone). Back then , digital cameras were still used by common "unprofessional" users. Digital cameras were an improvement compared to non-digital cameras, so the price of non-digital cameras were much lower than their digital counterparts.
If the price of digital cameras decreased, then the price of non-digital cameras would decrease also. For example, if luxury car companies like Mercedes Benz started selling sedan cars for $20,000, Ford and Chevrolet would be forced to lower the price of their cars since they wouldn't be able to compete with MB at the same price.
But a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would never decrease their demand. Something else would have caused that decrease. Probably digital cameras became so cheap that everyone could afford one and since they were so much better than non-digital cameras, people simply stopped buying non-digital cameras.
