Answer:
C
Explanation:
Because it shows that burns and it really shown us that burns look like what
Cause we have to find or know more about that burn proposed
Answer:
It is not fair according if he did the same thing in the past I would fight for him to have mo time for what he did .
Explanation:
<em>Hope this helps !!</em>
Answer:
it represents a federalist viewpoint on the need for protection of individual liberties
Answer:
The answer is: Stage 6 of "Reflective Reasoning"
Explanation:
The Reflective Judgment Model is used in order to describe how people from adolescence going to adulthood develop <u>"reasoning." </u>This framework consists of<em> 7 stages</em>. These stages are categorized under three kinds of thinking<em> (Pre-Reflective Reasoning, Quasi-Reflective Reasoning and Reflective Reasoning). </em>
The situation above falls under "Stage 6 of Reflective Reasoning." Under this stage,<u><em> "reflective thinking"</em></u> is considered. So, people in this stage know that<em> knowledge is not certain nor absolute,</em> thus they try to compare their opinion with others. Just like Carole and Juan above, even though they have opposing views, Carole understands Juan's opinion.
Thus, this explains the answer.
Answer and Explanation:
Because of the varied nature of crime, police operations must be diverse and flexible. Police must be able to react to situations that range from a threat of explosives to a fleeing suspect. During these operations, officers need tools and training to be as effective and as safe as possible.
