During 1803, Napoleon Bonaparte, who was the French ruler at that time, controlled the Louisiana Territory. President Jefferson believed that the French leader may be a threat to American trade and travel, so he decided to negotiate the Louisiana purchase. By doing so, the US would be able to use the Mississippi River and the Port of New Orleans more freely; both ports had been used by farmers to ship their crops and get paid. Jefferson was able to buy the Louisiana territory from France, since Napoleon Bonaparte needed money for the Great French War. As a result, with the purchase of this new territory, the land area of America nearly doubled.
Answer:
The focus of classical and operant conditioning is on external stimuli, responses and reinforcement; the focus of the cognitive learning approach is on internal thoughts and expectations of learning.
Explanation:
Classical and operant conditioning focus on the observable, such as <em>conducts and behaviors</em> the individual carries out. Both conditioning types try to produce a specific behavior on the individual through <em>stimulus, responses and reinforcement. </em>
Meanwhile, the cognitive learning approach, as the name states, focuses on the individual's cognition, meaning <em>its internal functions and processes,</em> saying there's more to the individual than what is observable. It focuses on one's <em>expectations</em> regarding learning.
According to Malthusian theory of population, population increases in a geometrical ratio, whereas food supply increases in an arithmetic ratio. This disharmony would lead to widespread poverty and starvation, which would only be checked by natural occurrences such as disease, high infant mortality, famine, war or moral restraint. His main contribution is in the agricultural sector. According to this theory there are two steps to control the population: preventative and positive checks. Preventative means control in birth rate, and uses of different methods to control birth; and positive checks means natural calamities, war, etc. His theory was wrong because Malthus only considered two factors when he established his basic graph: food supply and population growth. Other factors such as improvements in technology proved him wrong. He was right at his time but development made him wrong. If it wasn't for outside influences on population growth and food supply, his mathematical reasoning which proved his theory and was right. I HOPED THIS HELPED
As the substance melts the particles have a higher chance of colliding with one another and also move much faster than when the substance is solid. This is because the particles have a higher surface area to move around. Also the arrangements of particles are free.
