1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ololo11 [35]
2 years ago
5

3. A very brittle piece of iron metal (C=.44 J/gC) is heated to 200 C and placed

Physics
1 answer:
lubasha [3.4K]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:The temperature of a piece of Metal X with a mass m of 95.4g increases from 25.0°C to 48.0°C as the metal absorbs 849 J of heat.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
If a golf ball and a bowling ball are moving and both have the same genetic energy if they move at the same speed which one has
Anastaziya [24]
If they both have the same kinetic energy then they both have the same kinetic energy. otherwise it would be the bowling ball due to factors like weight
5 0
3 years ago
For a large atom, which of the following would give the most stable nuclear configuration?
seraphim [82]

My answer is  D but I will still try to word it out again

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hey v sauce here massive ti ts here there is many black wholes in space there is one in my A&& as well
exis [7]
I’m confused but I will answer that small snippet of a question, and it is that nobody knows how many black holes are in space but scientist have estimated that there are 10 million to a billion black holes
8 0
3 years ago
Why do scientist study the natural world to find solutions to human<br> problems?
Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

Science can not solve all of our problems. While scientific understanding can help battle things like disease, hunger, and poverty when applied properly, it does not do so completely and automatically. Furthermore, there are many areas of life where science can have little impact. Let us look at some of the reasons why this is so.  First of all, there is a huge difference between knowing something and acting on it. Science is concerned with accumulating and understanding observations of the physical world. That understanding alone solves no problems. Individual people have to act on that understanding for it to help solve problems. For instance, science has found that regular exercise can lower your risk of heart disease. Knowing this fact is interesting, but it will do nothing for your personal heath unless you act on it and actually exercise. And that's the hard part. Reading an article about exercise is easy. Getting into an actual routine of regular exercise is harder. In this sense, science really solves no problems at all. Problems are only solved when people take the knowledge (or tool, or pill, or whatever) provided by science and use it. In fact, many of humanity's biggest problems are caused by lack of action, and not lack of knowledge.

Take world hunger, for example. There is currently enough food produced on the earth every year to comfortably feed every single person. The world produces about 700 trillion grams of rice each year. With seven billion people on the planet, 365 days in the year, and about 40 grams per typical serving of rice, there is enough rice on the planet to feed every single last person seven servings of rice every day. And this is just rice. Similar numbers hold up for wheat, corn, meat, etc. Science has done an amazing job in the last 50 years of making farms productive. And yet, millions of people in the world still suffer starvation. Why? Because of actions. If all it took was science to solve problems, no one would go hungry anymore because there is enough food. We could fill books with the analysis of human actions that cause world hunger if we wanted to.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the final velocity of a car that is originally traveling 12 m/s and then undergoes an acceleration of 2.3m/s squared for
Katarina [22]

To solve this problem we use the general kinetic equations.

We need to know the time it takes for the car to reach 130 meters.

In this way we have to:

x(t) = x_0 + v_0t + 0.5at ^ 2

Where

x_0 = initial position

v_0 = initial velocity

a = acceleration

t = time

x(t) = position as a function of time

130 = 0 + 12(t) + 0.5(2.3)t ^ 2

1.15t ^ 2 + 12t - 130.

We use the quadratic formula to solve the equation.

t = \frac{-12 \± \sqrt {(12) ^ 2-4(1.15)(- 130)}}{2 (1.15)}

t = 6.63 s and t = -17.1 s

We take the positive solution. This means that the car takes 6.63 s to reach 130 meters.

Then we use the following equation to find the final velocity:

v_f = v_0 + at

Where:

v_f = final speed

v_f = 12 +2.23(6.63)

The final speed of the car is 27.25 m/s

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Work in the amount of 280 J is done in lifting an object a distance of 4.0 m in a time. How much force did it take to lift the o
    6·1 answer
  • Please help me find out this answer
    7·1 answer
  • The news media often report an earthquake's magnitude on the Richter scale. Which of the following items are characteristics of
    8·1 answer
  • Can anybody help me with this?? (Picture included.)
    10·1 answer
  • An engineer has designed the foundation for column system (20 columns) of a 5 story residential building. Preliminary excavation
    13·1 answer
  • A spring of negligible mass and force constant k = 400 N/m is hung vertically, and a 0.240 kg pan is suspended from its lower en
    11·1 answer
  • Which best describes a difference between laser light and regular light?
    12·1 answer
  • A constant-volume gas thermometer registers an absolute pressure corresponding to 325 mm of mercury when in contact with water a
    9·1 answer
  • Richard and Kokewa are using bar mognets in a science lesson. They begin to throw mognets on the
    13·1 answer
  • an A A projectile is fired at of 70 to the vertical with a velocity of 25ms the Horizontal component of angle calculate Velocity
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!