Answer:
A Psychologist is studying diversity in an organization, she has 10 employee participants, belonging to different departments, brought together to discuss their perceptions of diversity in the company. In the context of interviews, this is an example of a(n) <u>focus group.</u>
Explanation:
The Focus group is a group interview, where the moderator guides a collective interview during which a small group of people discusses the characteristics and dimensions of the proposed topic under discussion, that is, it is a meeting made up of several people in the which express opinions about a specific topic. This group is made up of 8 to 10 participants, who must come from a similar context, but maintaining the necessary diversity within the context.
The correct answer is <span>avoidance.
Avoidance refers to a conflict resolution technique that involves ignoring or not responding to provocation. Avoidance is an effective technique to resolve and deal with trivial conflicts, however, for more serious conflicts, avoidance does not resolve conflicts and usually backfires since conflicts can resurface when suppressed. </span><span>
</span>
Answer:
A correlation is only a mathematical means of describing the relationship between variables. When it is a positive correlation, it means when the value of one increases, for example, the value of the other variable also increases or when one decreases, so does the other. A negative correlation would show that as one variable increases in value, the other decreases. These relationships are non-causal as you're not manipulating variables to control them to see what is causing this relationship. Sometimes, non-causal covariance (or variables that don't have an effect on each other vary cooincidentally in a pattern-like fashion, when there is actually another variable causing the relationship going on.
Explanation:
In the case of this example, it is doubtful that having money causes you to have a higher grade point average. So while we see an increase in grade point average with those who have high income it could be due to other factors, like people with more money have access to learning tools, tutors and other things that people with less money don't have access to. So it is access to tools, not money that is actually causing a difference. There are likely dozens if not hundreds of other potential confounded variables that could be causing this observation.
The Supreme Court often chooses to hear many cases each year that do not involve any issues of constitutional interpretation, but which only involve interpreting federal statutes.
