Do you love Selena Quintanilla?
Answer:
1.) supplementary m<1+m<2=180 and m<2+m<3=180
2.) congruent, supplementary
Step-by-step explanation:
the answers are in this order above
9514 1404 393
Answer:
-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3
Step-by-step explanation:
This inequality can be resolved to a compound inequality:
-7 ≤ (3x -5)/2 ≤ 7
Multiply all parts by 2.
-14 ≤ 3x -5 ≤ 14
Add 5 to all parts.
-9 ≤ 3x ≤ 19
Divide all parts by 3.
-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
If you subtract 7 from both sides of the given inequality, it becomes ...
|(3x -5)/2| -7 ≤ 0
Then you're looking for the values of x that bound the region where the graph is below the x-axis. Those are shown in the attachment. For graphing purposes, I find this comparison to zero works well.
__
For an algebraic solution, I like the compound inequality method shown above. That only works well when the inequality is of the form ...
|f(x)| < (some number) . . . . or ≤
If the inequality symbol points away from the absolute value expression, or if the (some number) expression involves the variable, then it is probably better to write the inequality in two parts with appropriate domain specifications:
|f(x)| > g(x) ⇒ f(x) > g(x) for f(x) > 0; or -f(x) > g(x) for f(x) < 0
Any solutions to these inequalities must respect their domains.
Answer:
a) #4 vertical angles are congruent
b) # 1 ∠3 ≅ ∠7
c) # 6 Transitive property
Step-by-step explanation:
a. Vertical angles - opposite angles that are equal.
b. corresponding angles - in the same place but on different parallel lines
and are equal.
c. a = b, b = c so a = c
Please don't just copy and paste or click an answer! PLEASE READ! I spend 14 minutes and I at least want you to read it!
11.2 * 1.4 = 15.68
Mark me brainliest if you can!