Hello. Did you forget to show that the underlined words to which the question refers are: cruel favor
In addition, you forgot to show the answer options. The options are:
The underlined figure of speech is ________ (choices: a euphemism, a simile, a metaphor, an oxymoron)
The reader can infer that ________ (choices: the narrator plans to take up baking with Lisette, the narrator feels that Lisette should do her more favors, the narrator will pretend to enjoy Lisette's brownies, the narrator suspects that Lisette is dishonest with her)
Answer:
1. euphemism
2. the narrator will pretend to enjoy Lisette's brownies
Explanation:
Euphenism is the figure of speech that has a lighter and more pleasant term, softening a bad meaning of another term that could be used. In this case, when the narrator says that Lisette took the Brownies as a "cruel favor" he wanted to soften the meaning that eating her brownies would be a bad experience.
Furthermore, by using eupenism, the author reinforces the idea that since Lisette is a very kind person, he will pretend to like the brownies, even if he doesn't like it.
how do i delete my answer?
Answer:
quacker packer, colder boulder, wordy birdy, jolly polly
Hope this helps! I would really appreciate it if you marked me brainliest
Answer:
D. All I can say about my rival's idea is that he's a thief and he should be ignored.
Explanation:
Ad Hominem is a Latin word that means "against the man".
This particular fallacy of ad hominem is simply the act of going against sound logic when making an argument to make personal attacks on the speaker.
From the example above, there was a personal attack on the rival against his idea while bringing up the matter that he was a thief and should be ignored.
This is a very good example of Ad Hominem fallacy because he threw away sound logic while making his argument and instead chose personal attacks against his rival to score cheap points.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
as you read the Breeze to the horizon
