Answer by YourHope:
Hi! :)
1) What do paragraphs 2-5 have in common?
A) They clearly address only one side of the argument!!
2) What is the author's purpose in writing this passage?
C) to inform the reade!!!
:)
Answer:The baker explained to her customer, "On top of this lovely French vanilla cake <u>sit</u> several fondant roses surrounded by a raspberry drizzle."
Explanation:
The subject-verb agreement error is the verb 'sits.' Since this verb has to agree with the noun phrase "several fondant roses", the correct form of the verb is 'sit.' With the pronoun 'several', plural verb is always used. Moreover, we can conclude by the noun 'roses' that the verb that goes with it must be plural. We would say that the roses sit - which is a plural form.
I think its d because irony means you are meaning the exact opposite of what your saying
Answer:
Answer is C. an independent clause (A. a coordinating conjunction) Explanation: Although nothing is underlined, I think the question stiil can be answered. But first, a quick revision. Independent clause is the one that conveys a complete thought and contains enough information to stand on its own. On the othet hand, dependent clause can only express a meaning if it is linked to an independent clause via the subordinating conjunction. In our sentence, both clauses, "The harsh wind scoured the scant remaining leaves from the trees" and "A desolate landscape remained in its wake" are independent clauses and as such they are linked together via a coordinating conjunction "and". So, if any of these two clauses is underlined then the correct answer is "independent clause". However, if the conjunction "and" is underlined, then the answer is "coordinating conjunction".
