A I think I’m not actually sure
Here are some examples of communication difficulties that exist:
- Behavioral issues and learning
- English not being the first dialect - Shy or tentative individuals
- Children or grown-ups that are not tuning in through general disrespect- Hearing impairment and speech difficulties
- Not getting on with associates or managing double-faced individuals
- Not making time to communicate or talk with one another.
Answer:
For the individual, unemployment can cause psychological distress, which can lead to a decline in life satisfaction. It can also lead to mood disorders and substance abuse. ... Both communities are characterised by high levels of poverty and unemployment, the remnants of the spatial inequality of the country's racial past
The personal and social costs of unemployment include severe financial hardship and poverty, debt, homelessness and housing stress, family tensions and breakdown, boredom, alienation, shame and stigma, increased social isolation, crime, erosion of confidence and self-esteem, the atrophying of work skills and ill-health.
I believe the answer is: <span>war was fought on multiple fronts
The multiple fronts make the Allies surrounded from both sides which limit their movement/mobilization
The alliance have to face the millitary threat from Germany on the enters front. On this front, The soviet union played the most crucial role in preventing the nazi's advance.
</span><span>From the western front, the western Europeans allies fought to stop the advance from japanese and italian army.</span>
<span>To divide we the people to weaken us, set us against each other with blame games and propaganda. Party loyalty blinders keep us from watching too closely what our own party representatives are doing against our own interests.
Like professional wrestlers they appear to be bitter rivals in public but are the best of friends behind closed doors. They have led us to think that only someone from their parties can win an election. If we vote for a third party candidate we have "thrown our vote away" on someone who stands no chance of winning and let that "evil other party" candidate win. We feel compelled to vote for the "lesser" of the two evils being offered.
Consider this: Both parties of the Senate said that the TARP bill lacked oversight to protect the taxpayer's money (concerning the original 3 page one passed by the House of Representatives). They claimed they were going to add protection and oversight to it. Then behind closed doors they added 137 pages of earmark spending and NO oversight or protection. Bush signed it and they closed the 110 Session of Congress knowing that they had an automatic pay raise in place. Both parties were involved so no evil other party blame games could be played.
Instead they faked outrage when the AIG bonus news came out and blamed the Management for not following rules which they had failed to put into the TARP bill in the first place. Watch this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu...</span>
