Answer:
its c
Explanation:
follow me at sssniper wolf ;D
Answer:
Your opportunity cost of attending a game compared with the opportunity cost facing a college student 10 years ago is:
A) higher, because more games are televised today.
Opportunity costs are the cost of choosing one alternative from another.
In this case, when college students attend college football games they are unable to do other activities, not only while they are at the stadium or going to the stadium, but they are not able to purchase other goods. The cost of those alternatives that are lost are higher now because many college football games are televised now, before if you wanted to see a game you had to go to the game. So a student is now able to watch the game while doing other activities, or saving money for buying something else.
Can this change in opportunity cost account for the decline in college football attendance?
B) Yes, because these changes increase the opportunity cost of watching football games in person.
Even though opportunity costs do not involve actual cash payments, they are still important and individuals do consider them when they are choose one option over another. E.g. imagine if you had to choose between spending a considerable amount of money by attending a game (ticket, gas, beverages, etc.) or watching that game on TV and buying a few clothes instead or going on a date, etc. What option would you choose?
Answer:
preferred habitat
Explanation:
According to the preferred habitat theory, if the expected returns from investment of a particular investment maturity is large enough, investors would shift from their preferred maturities.
In this question, there is a shift from the preferred maturity (short-term securities) to a long-term securities when interest rate changes
The pure expectations theory assumes that bonds of any maturity are perfect substitutes for each other. For example, if an investor buys a 10 year bond and holds it for 1 year, the return is the same as buying a 1 year bond. The theory also assumes that risk premium does not exist and a security only earns its risk free rate
Liquidity premium theory states that risk premium increases with the maturity of a bond. The theory predicts that the yield curve is upward sloping due to liquidity premium
According to the segmented market theory, each bond maturity segment can be thought of as a segment market in which yield are a function of the demand and supply for funds in that maturity.
Based on the economic data given, and the fact that the government is running a deficit, the equilibrium GDP will be 336.67.
If government spending is cut to balance the budget, the new level of GDP will be 321.67.
The effect of balancing the budget will be a decrease in GDP and a slower recovery from the recesssion.
<h3>What is the equilibrium GDP?</h3>
This is given by the variable "Y" so we can find the equilibrium GDP by solving for it:
C = 50 + .7(Y – T)
Y = C + I + G - XN
C = Y - I - G + XN
Solving gives:
Y - I - G + XN = 50 + .7(Y – T)
Y - 40 - 35 + 10 = 50 + 0.7Y - 14
Y - 0.7Y = 50 + 40 + 35 - 10 - 14
0.3Y = 101
Y = 101/0.3
= 336.67
<h3>What is the new GDP if government spending is cut?</h3>
Government spending will have to be cut to a size that would make it equal to taxes so government spending becomes 20.
New GDP becomes:
= C + I + G - XN
= ( 50 + .7(Y – T)) + 40 + 20 - 10
= 271.67 + 40 + 20 - 10
= 321.67
Find out more on GDP at brainly.com/question/1384502.
