Answer:
No, as hearsay not within any exception.
Explanation:
(B) The sketch is inadmissible on hearsay grounds. Under Rule 801 of the Federal Rules, prior identification can be admissible, and the sketch could be deemed a prior identification. However, to be admissible, the witness must be there to testify at trial and be subject to cross-examination. The witness in this case is unavailable; hence, this exception does not apply. (D) is therefore incorrect. (A) applies to documentary evidence and has no relevance to this question. (C) is likewise not applicable, because this exception applies only to information within the personal knowledge of the public employee. In this case, the public employee gained the knowledge from the hearsay statements of an absent witness.
Answer:
Undercover work can be extremely dangerous, not only physically, but even mentally. Though it's not often, some UC's start believing they are the person they're playing. They might get too focused on their roles, and it could cause a lot of psychological damage to be undercover for so long. Also, there are physical risks of being undercover, especially if said cover is blown.
Explanation:
Answer:
It would be E because they need probable cause to search the house.
Explanation:
B would not be correct because to pass the security check you must be searched.
C would be incorrect because officers can Search/Pat anyone down that they have stopped without probable cause.
D is not correct as the owner gives consent
A is incorrect because School Administrators only need reasonable suspicion.
