Answer:
Explanation:
The def: not in accordance with a political constitution, especially the US Constitution, or with procedural rules. Ex." we cannot tolerate unconstitutional action" Declaring laws constitutional or un unconstitutional is done by the deciding in the Judicial Branch of government.
However, governments do not just create laws. Governments also enforce the laws set forth in the document defining the government—in the Constitution. In the United States, the failure to seat duly elected representatives of the people following a proper election, or the failure to provide for such elections would be unconstitutional even in the absence of any legislated laws whatsoever.
When the proper court determines that a legislative act (a law) conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. This is called judicial review. The portion of the law declared void is considered struck down, or the entire statute is considered struck from the statute books.
Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court, or only by special Constitutional courts with authority to rule on the validity of a statute. In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. This can occur either because the country has no codified constitution that laws must conform to (e.g., the United Kingdom and New Zealand) or because the constitution is codified but no court has the authority to strike down laws on the basis of it (e.g., the Netherlands and Switzerland).
The Electoral College is a group of people that elects the president and the vice president of the United States. (The word “college” in this case simply refers to an organized body of people engaged in a common task.)
Trade Act of 1974 granted the president the ability to engage in trade negotiations, Congress limited presidential jurisdiction by requiring a determination that any agreement will not endanger national security and would promote the purposes of the Act.
The National Origins Act of 1924 aimed to regulate both the amount and quality of immigrants to the United States in an effort to stop further eroding of the ethnic composition of American society.
The 1924 Immigration Act, which was a legislative expression of the xenophobia that swept through America throughout the 1920s, especially with regard to immigrants from eastern and southern Europe, was passed by the House on this day in 1924. The first total numerical immigration quota, which applied to almost 350,000 persons in 1921, was eventually reduced to 165,000 in 1924. The 1924 statute established annual limits for each country based on the number of foreign-born Americans from each European country who resided in the United States in 1890. While severely restricting immigration from southern and eastern Europe and outright banning it from nearly all of Asia, Congress devised an extraordinarily tight system of ethnic quotas in 1924, which effectively ended mass immigration for decades.
Learn more about Act of 1924 from
brainly.com/question/1916562
#SPJ4
