Answer:
The net savings changed the most, and this is because of the extra money coming in via total income. An extra $290.00 was added to the category.
Explanation:
Answer:
c. $3,200 favorable.
Explanation:
We know that
Total controllable cost variance = Budgeted overhead cost - actual overhead cost
where,
Budgeted overhead cost = Variable overhead + Fixed overhead
where,
Variable overhead = 40,000 units × $2 = $80,000
And, the fixed overhead = $72,000
So, the budgeted overhead = $152,000
And, the actual one is $148,800
So, the total controllable cost variance would be
= $152,000 - $148,800
= $3,200 favorable
Cancel your credit cards and anything that may cause trouble like debt or charges
Answer:
WACC is 9%
Explanation:
WACC is the average cost of capital of the firm based on the weightage of the debt and weightage of the equity multiplied to their respective costs.
According to WACC formula
WACC = ( Cost of equity x Weightage of equity ) + ( Cost of debt ( 1- t) x Weightage of debt ) + ( Cost of Preferred equity x Weightage of Preferred equity )
As per given data
Market Values
Equity = $7 billion,
Preferred stock = $2 billion
Debt = $13 billion
Cost
Equity
Capital asset pricing model measure the expected return on an asset or investment. it is considered as the cost of common stock.
Formula for CAPM
Cost of Equity = Risk free rate + beta ( market return - risk free rate )
Cost of Equity = Rf + β ( Mrp )
Cost of Equity = 3% + 1.6 ( 8% ) = 15.8%
Preferred stock = $2 / $26 = 0.077 = 7.7%
Debt = 8%
Placing values in the formula
WACC = ( 15.8% x $7 billion / $22 billion ) + ( 8% ( 1- 0.3) x $13 billion / $22 billion ) + ( 7.7% x $2 billion / $22 billion )
WACC = 5.03% + 3.31% + 0.7% = 9.04%
Answer: False
Explanation:
In both the first and second years, firms in country A undertook FDI projects of $20 billion in country B. This means that Country A had FDI outflows of $20 billion in those two years not inflows. Inflows are what happens when the FDI is coming into the country.
Country B on the other hand, was receiving money from country A. Country B therefore had FDI inflows of $20 billion in each of the two years and not outflows like Country A had.