<span>I believe it is light, but this is kind of a confusing question. Technically there is a independent and dependent variable in the question. The variable being manipulated is light, and the earthwork activity depends on the light. </span>
I don’t think so because when you are observing you refer to facts but when you infer you have to hypothesize what the outcome will be
For starters, the left image is a plant cell and the right image is an animal cell.
The black dots in both images would be drawn to the nucleus. All cells have nuclei. The black oval in the right image would be drawn to the cell membrane. Only animal cells have these. The rectangle with a gap would be drawn to the cell wall. Only plant cells have cell walls. The space surrounding the nucleus in both cells would be drawn to cytoplasm. All cells have cytoplasm. The dotted circles would be drawn to chloroplast. Only plant cells have these.
Hope I could help!
Answer:Based on the information given we can not say pea aphid as an autotroph. Because pea aphid ability to produce ATP in the presence of sun is due to the light-capturing pigment that it gains from the genes transferred from fungi.
As pea aphid do not have any chloroplast and it cannot fix carbon so it is not a true autotroph. We can say it false autotroph because it can produce ATP in the presence of sunlight and can show increased production of ATP at the higher level of pigment.
Explanation: Sub to rockingmycoolstyle15 on yt
