Answer:
The major premise is lack of House to pay attention towards the road ahead of him and the rule of contributory negligence. By using this jurisdiction, the plaintiff's damages will be reduced.
Explanation:
- The defendant driver, while he may ultimately be liable if all of the witnesses say he ran the stop sign, will raise the comparative fault of House for failing to keep a proper lookout and failing to take evasive action to avoid a collision.
- The defenses are the same as they would be if the collision was with another car instead of a bicycle.
- House had an ordinary duty to pay attention to the road ahead of him and keep himself and others safe.
- By watching his books and not the traffic, he breached that duty.
- I'm not saying that defense will be successful, but that's what would be alleged by the car's driver as a defense.
- In most states, the damages to the plaintiff will be reduced by the percentage of his/her comparative fault (also known in some jurisdictions as contributory negligence).
- In some states, if the plaintiff's comparative fault is shown to be over 50%, there will be no recovery at all.
A because it's life insurance u gonna have to pay payments if u don't pay full ahead of time but it's life keyword life so it's permanent
Media plays an important role in protecting and promoting human rights in the world.
<h3>What is human rights violation?</h3>
A human rights violation refers to the disallowance of the freedom of thought and movement to which all humans legally have a right.
Media can make people aware of the need to promote certain values in the cause of human rights which are of eternal value to mankind.
Media can make people aware of their rights, expose their violations and focus attention on people and areas in need of the protection of human rights and pursue their cases till they achieve them.
Learn more about human rights violations here:
brainly.com/question/23566079
#SPJ1
Answer:
the teacher should push the student away and then report him becuse that is counted as sexual assault and he can face charges for it
Explanation:
i think that it would be good because it has proof of what wveryone says so they cant say that tgey said something different or that they didnt plead guilty
