Answer:
A) judging, criticizing, and placing blame.
Explanation:
First of all, the social worker is not even considering the possibility that Andrew could have been fired without justification, or that he could get his job back, he is placing blame exclussively on the worker (Andrew).
Besides, he is judging Andrew as an alcoholic, or at least, as a person who has serious problems with alcohol consumption (so serious to the point of going to work drunk and being fired because of that), and finally, the social worker is criticizing the way Andrew is dealing with his possible alcoholism, because he is telling Andrew that he is not even Aware of what alcohol is doing to him.
The answer would be C. the nobles who lived in luxury
Answer:
The answer is - Inferences
Explanation:
The options are:
A. contaminated observations.
B. inferences.
C. distorted behaviors.
D. illusory correlations.
The answer is B- inferences
Inference can be defined as a logical conclusion which is gotten on the basis of evidence and logical reasoning and through the use of knowledge and information.
In the scenario here, it is reasonable to infer that the SUV hit the smaller car due to the evidence that the smaller car is damaged while the SUV which is bigger only has a headlight broken.
On February 21, 1972<span>, President Richard M. Nixon arrived in China for an official trip. He was the first U.S. president to visit the People's Republic of China since it was established in </span>1949<span>. This was an important event because the U.S. was seeking to improve relations with a Communist country during the Cold War.</span>
