1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
leonid [27]
2 years ago
14

Compare the early Roman Empire to the empire conquered by Alexander the Great. Why did the Roman Empire hold together for so muc

h longer than Alexander's?
History
1 answer:
Anna35 [415]2 years ago
3 0

The Answer is:

Alexander’s troops had much protection on their head and chest. This could be because their troops were more valuable and not as replaceable as the Romans who also had protective armor but not as heavy. The Romans carried more light armor for better mobility. To the Romans speed was more important than defense. They did not fight like a unit as much as the Alexandrians did, it was more stagnant and vicious.

Explanation:

I hope this answers your question.

You might be interested in
The Germans most likely knew that the Lusitania was carrying war supplies for the British. Did this give them the right to sink
Sonja [21]

Depends on how you look at it.. They were desperate and had to stop the British from gaining support. But it wasn't confirmed that It was carrying weapons, there were civilians on it so theres good reasoning why they sunk it. The Germans did not let civilian casualties get in their way really as seen with their bombing of cities and use of chemical warfare.

7 0
3 years ago
(25 points <3)
Wewaii [24]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

armored men on horsemen are sometimes referred to as knights

Have a godly day! :D

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who were the first two cabinets
Reptile [31]
The first 4 cabinets were Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, Henry Knox, and Edmund Randolph.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one reason that colonizers preferred to enslave Africans to work in the colonies?
irakobra [83]

Answer:

The people in the colonies are lazy, it's that simple. Colonies thought if they captured someone who is considered a lower class the them, they could use them as property, and work labores.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
When was the 2nd world war​
sasho [114]

Answer:

1 september 1939 - 2 september 1945

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why is history open to on going and changing interpretations
    10·1 answer
  • Why is it necessary to limit individual rights?
    14·2 answers
  • The Second Continental Congress met in Philadelphia in order to __________. A. coordinate the rebellion against Britain B. petit
    15·1 answer
  • 25
    13·1 answer
  • The "corrupt bargain" in the election of 1824 referred to: a. the blatant miscounting of ballots in the Electoral College b. Jac
    9·1 answer
  • Possible or Not Possible?
    12·1 answer
  • How does the image relate to some of the claims made in the passage? To what degree does the workforce pictured in factory repre
    14·1 answer
  • Who lead the Christmas rebellion?​
    11·1 answer
  • 1. What does Williams say was God's reason for giving mankind a "Nature fitted for... Society"
    12·1 answer
  • For most of american history, the bill of rights was understood as a series of amendments on what?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!