<span>The father of modern Russia taxed wearers of these in 1705. Only orthodox clergy were exempt from the tax. what was being taxed?
Their BEARD was being taxed.
Peter the Great wanted to follow European men in not wearing beards in order to "modernize" Russia. He imposed taxes on Russian men who opted to keep their beards rather than be clean shaven. </span>
Answer:
C) luxury item, an increase
Explanation:
Price elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded to changes in price.
An elastic demand means a small change in price leads to a greater change in quantity demanded.
A luxury good is a good that isn't a necessity. They are usually bought as a status symbol.
Luxury goods usually have elastic demands.
Emeralds are luxury goods and if there's a fall in price of emeralds the quantity demanded of emeralds would rise.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
No, their economic cost of enrolling in the business program is not the same for both,
Explanation:
The explicit costs of going back to college are the same for Walter and Jesse, e.g. they might be $20,000 per year, or even $30,000 doesn't matter for this analysis. But Walter is currently working as a teacher and that means taht if he decides to go to college, his implicit costs will include the forgone salary as a teacher which is $50,000 per year. Implicit costs are opportunity costs, i.e. additional costs or benefits lost from choosing one activity or investment instead of another alternative.
Since Jesse is not working, whether she goes back to college or not will not affect her income, it will still be $0, but if Walter goes back to college he will lose his salary.
Answer:
It would decrease the net assets by $60,800
Explanation:
The computation of the translation adjustment for 2017 is shown below:
For common stock
= Issued amount × (revised exchange rate - exchange rate)
= $1,000,000 × (0.42 - 0.48)
= -$60,000
For dividend
= Dividend paid × (revised exchange rate - exchange rate)
= $20,000 × (0.42 - 0.46)
= -$800
For net income
= Net income × (revised exchange rate - exchange rate)
= $80,000 × (0.42 - 0.42)
= $0
So, it would decrease the net assets by $60,800 ($60,000 + $800)
