Which of the following summarizes the Three-fifths Compromise?

1 answer:

6 0

A three-fifths compromise is the compromise that has been made by the slaves for the purpose of taxation and representation for a white person.

What is a three-fifths compromise?

A three-fifths compromise is a kind of agreement that has been made between the Northern and Southern state delegates at the U.S. Constitutional Convention (1787). It was mentioned in the agreement that direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives would be done by the three-fifth slaves.

The compete question is attached in the image below.

Thus, three-fifths of the compromise was basically done by slaves for white people.

Learn more about the three-fifths compromise from here:

brainly.com/question/10987562

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

What is the bill of rights and how did it come to be added to the constitution

Daniel [21]

Answer:

The first ten amendment to the United States constitution, which is a general listing of the rights of the people is known as the Bill of Rights.

Explanation:

When there were no general rights of the people listed in the constitution, there was an outcry by the people which prompted those additions. These rights defend the American citizens’ freedoms and grant them freedom of speech, religion, assemble and due process of law.

The Bill of Rights was conscripted in New York City by James Madison and were ratified in 1791.

4 0

3 years ago

What do you think of the concept of leadership of Filipinos in general?

Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

Answer:

They're very good and cautious

7 0

3 years ago

32. The Smith System does not include

Archy [21]

I’m currently doing drivers ed, and the smith system includes aiming high in steering, leaving yourself an out, and keeping your eyes moving, so the answer is A.

3 0

2 years ago

1.) If I Can’t Have You. Bertha shot and ki((ed her husband and his lover after discovering them having passion in his car. When

Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

You are the trial judge at the sentencing hearing. If you wish, you can rely on the suppressed confession for a sentence enhancement, in effect imposing the same sentence Bertha would have received for second-degree murder. Should you do so? Why or why not?

b. If you were on the appellate court reviewing Bertha’s sentence imposed as described in (a), would you rule that this sentence is fair?

5 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of these actions is most likely to be permitted in dealing with a person with limited English proficiency?

djyliett [7]

Answer: allowing a child to interpret in an emergency

Explanation:

Under the ACA Section 1557, we should note that there should not be any form of discrimination against anyone simply because such person cannot speak English.

Therefore, in a scenario whereby there is someone with limited English proficiency, the most likely to action to be allowed is to allow a child to interpret in the case of an emergency.

6 0

2 years ago