Answer:
It is either B or D
Explanation:
Apologies if this is unhelpful
What is Katz argument: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
What is the Katz v United States holding: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
Answer:
Legal Realism school of jurisprudential thought, according to which shifting the legal structure of Dixonville in order to account for the changes that are occurring. Whereas the remaining ones are not relevant in this context.
