Explanation:
hope I'll help you mark me as brainliest
Answer:
Sales 950,000
Less: Relevant cost:
Variable expenses 380,000
Avoidable fixed manufacturing expenses 217,000
Avoidable fixed selling and administrative expenses 178,000
Contribution 175,000
The total profit of Furrow Corporation reduces by $175,000 if the product is discontinued.
Explanation:
In this question, there is need to determine contribution, which is the excess of sales over relevant costs. Relevant costs are comprised of variable cost and avoidable fixed costs. The product should not be discontinued since the contribution is positive. Deleting a product with positive contribution reduces the total profit of the company by the amount of positive contribution.
Answer:
architectural innovation
Explanation:
The scenario is describing the term known as architectural innovation. This refers to the innovation of the specific architecture of any product that changes and/or modifies the way the different components of the machine link or relate to each other, thus allowing it to perform new functions or the same functions but in a much more user-friendly manner. This is what Canon did by changing the architecture of the copying machine so that it was more user-friendly for the end consumer.
Answer: 15%
Explanation:
IRR is the discount rate that makes the NPV equal zero. Required rates of return that are less than the IRR will therefore result in a positive NPV and those that are higher will result in a negative NPV.
Use Excel to find the IRR.
= IRR(-328325,115000,115000,115000,115000)
= 15%
As the required rate of 13% is less than the IRR of 15%, the new machine will have a positive NPV.
Answer:
b. Jim may have been misrepresented in the story by the newspaper agency and the company might face legal consequences.
Explanation:
Jim has the right to take legal action against the company for releasing the story. The investigation had not been completed and all facts had not been established by the company.
Also the newspaper did not contact Jim to get his own side of the story before publishing, that could have revealed pertinent information about the case.
