Answer:
C. strictly liable for Will's injuries
Explanation:
In law, Strict liability is a situation when defendant is required to be responsible to a certain situation, but can't be considered as guilty to any violation.
There are two points that need to be highlighted from the case above:
1. Astor Manufacturing process has fulfilled all of its safety regulation for storing the dangerous product.
2. The dangerous product owned by Astor Manufacturing caused William's injury.
The regulations for hazard management is created by the government, and the leak is not caused by their negligence. It's caused by unexpected natural disaster. This is why we can't say that Astor is guilty to any violation.
But still, the chemical that they created injured William. The court will most likely force Astor to be responsible for all the medical expenses incurred by william.
Answer:
$8,495,833
Explanation:
<u>Calculation of weighted-average accumulated expenditures</u>
Date Payments Funds used Annualized Amount
Mar 1 $6450000 10/12 $6450000*10/12 $5,375,000
Jun 1 $5350000 7/12 $5350000*7/12 $3,120,833
Dec 31 $8250000 0/12 $$8250000*0/12 <u>$0 </u>
Weighted Average Expenditures <u>$8,495,833</u>
Answer:
Labour rate variance $2,925 unfavorable
Explanation:
<em>The labour rate variance is the difference between the standard labour cost allowed for the actual hours worked and the actual labor cost for the same hours</em>
$
Standard labour cost ($19.70× 6500) 128,050
Actual labour cost <u>130,975</u>
Labour rate variance <u> 2,925 unfavorable</u>
Answer:
B. Capital
Explanation:
It would be capital because households pay for the certain goods or services a business has to offer, therefore giving them money. The word "Capital" means funds/money, and since the households are giving the businesses money, they care supplying capitals.
.