Answer:
Since the question is partial, i will assume 2 scenarios:
They need to raise 1000 income
They need to make 1000 as profit
If $1000 as income:
Each ticket costs $15, so tickets would bring them $1000 income. Fractional ticket is not possible, so rounding gives us 67 tickets as the answer.
If $1000 as profit:
Their cost of renting is $700. We know that .
So, . So, to raise $1700, we need tickets. Fractional ticket is not possible, so rounding gives us 114 tickets as the answer.
ANSWER:
If need to raise atleast $1000 as income, they need to sell 67 tickets.
If need to raise atleast $1000 as profit, they need to sell 114 tickets.
The most probable answer would be 114 tickets
PLZ MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Note: Actually, the division problem should be in reverse order. It should be given as 
---------(i)
But according to the given problem (x + 1) / (x² + 3 x + 2).
Here, (x² + 3 x + 2) > (x + 1)
or, (x + 2) > 1
Concept: By using the property of division, if the numerator is less than the denominator then the quotient will always be 0 (zero)
Therefore the option (d) 0 will be the correct option.
You could rewrite
as
and be tempted to cancel out the factors of
. But this cancellation is only valid when
.
When
, you end up with the indeterminate form
, which is why
is not a zero.
I think it’s true because happy body happy mine
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
There are two concepts:
1. Row Echelon Form: There can be more than two <em>row echelon forms</em> of a single matrix, so different sequences of row operations can lead to different <em>row echelon forms</em> of a single matrix.
2. Reduced Row Echelon Form: It's unique for each matrix, so different sequences of row operations always lead to the same <em>reduced row echelon form</em> for the same matrix.
