Answer:
Her second lap was <u>8%</u> better when compared to her first lap.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Emily ran her first lap in 75 seconds she ran her second lap in 69 seconds.
Now, to find how much better was her second lap when compared to her first lap.
Emily ran her first lap in 75 seconds.
Emily ran her second lap in 69 seconds.
So, we get the difference in seconds:
<u><em>Thus, in her second lap she was 6 seconds better than first.</em></u>
Now, to get the percentage of her first lap better than second:
Therefore, her second lap was 8% better when compared to her first lap.
So -56 -13 = -69
So the answer would be 69?
You didn’t show the options.
There's some unknown (but derivable) system of equations being modeled by the two lines in the given graph. (But we don't care what equations make up these lines.)
There's no solution to this particular system because the two lines are parallel.
How do we know they're parallel? Parallel lines have the same slope, and we can easily calculate the slope of these lines.
The line on the left passes through the points (-1, 0) and (0, -2), so it has slope
(-2 - 0)/(0 - (-1)) = -2/1 = -2
The line on the right passes through (0, 2) and (1, 0), so its slope is
(0 - 2)/(1 - 0) = -2/1 = -2
The slopes are equal, so the lines are parallel.
Why does this mean there is no solution? Graphically, a solution to the system is represented by an intersection of the lines. Parallel lines never intersect, so there is no solution.
Answer:
x=101
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, the second order of polynomial ax² + bx + c is factorized and expressed as the product of two linear factors. First, we have to find the two numbers that adds to 12 and if we multiply those numbers , we get 36 ( The two numbers should be 6 and 6 ).
⟶ 
⟶ 
{ Distribute x through the parentheses )
⟶ 
⟶ 
⟶ 
⟶ 
Hope I helped ! ♡
Have a wonderful day / night ! ツ
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
