Fred's parents are reinforcing his negative behaviors on a "partial reinforcement schedule".
<h3>What is a partial reinforcement schedule?</h3>
The majority of reinforcement schedules are partial, and they can be either fixed or variable in terms of the number of replies they reward, or they can be interval or ratio-based in terms of the amount of time between responses. The number of answers or the interval between reinforcements is fixed and unchanging under a fixed schedule.
The reaction is only reinforced sometimes in partial or intermittent reinforcement. With fractional support, learned behaviors are acquired more gradually, but the reaction is more resistant to eradication.
Although you initially used a regular calendar, it may not always be practicable to reinforce each and every instance of the behavior. In the end, you can decide to go to a fractional calendar where you only provide help when a lot of reactions occur or when a lot of time has passed.
To know more about the partial reinforcement schedule refer to: brainly.com/question/24848347
#SPJ4
Answer: The mortgage broker.
Explanation:
The mortgage broker is an individual or company that connects the mortgage borrower to the right mortgage lender, which the mortgage borrower can afford their interest rates on mortgage.
The mortgage broker is paid by the mortgage lender for each mortgage borrower they bring that successfully borrows a property.
Answer: spends large amounts of time operating a computer.
Explanation:
If the coughing continues and your chest is hurting then you probably have bronchidas
Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
