The Portuguese man was Vasco da Gama.
<h3>Who was Vasco da Gama?</h3>
Vasco da Gama was the first European and Portuguese explorer, who reached to the India though the sea.
He was the first discoverer who link Europe and India by an Ocean route. He completed his long journey by way of Cape.
Later on, he died on Dec. 24, 1524. due to some illness.
Learn more about the Vasco da Gama here:-
brainly.com/question/2715544
#SPJ1
Answer:
Frictional unemployment - the unemployment which exists in any economy due to people being in the process of moving from one job to another.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
gandhian concept was truth, he used non violence as a weapon to gain freedom from the britishian roles
Because back in the day some people didn't want to believe and the ones who did help him and knew what Jesus had to do and understood. they knew what he does and they where believers and they were with the whole time and so was he and he was going to help Zacchaeus. And people just did not realy want to believe him and took it the wrong way. But the people who believed in him knew what he was capeable of everything basically.
Allan Bakke had been the subject of a case involving <u>“reverse discrimination” </u>during the carter administration.
In 1978 Allan Bakke applied for admission at medical school and it was declined twice by the University of California, so Bakke filed a suit against the University arguing that he had better scores than the minority groups that were granted access.
At that time, the university had reserved a quota of 16%, as part of affirmative action program, to minority groups. Affirmative action program was designed to provide better educational and employment opportunities to those groups.
In this legal case, Bakke claimed that the use of quota based on race was unfair “reverse discrimination” as according the Civil Right Act, equal protection should be given to all citizens. The Supreme Court, in a highly controversial case, ordered that the university should admit Bakke and declared that affirmative action was constitutional but could not be used in cases of race quotas.
