Mentoring involves personal fulfilment more than just the two individuals involved in the interaction (mentor and mentee).
As your more seasoned employees retire or move on to new positions, mentoring is a means to pass on important skills and information to the "next generation" of workers.
This offers great protection against a "brain drain," which occurs when important individuals leave a company and it struggles to cover performance shortages. Because employees believe they have options to further their professional credentials inside, mentorship has a positive effect on staff retention and productivity.
The mentor might take some pride in her accomplishments and feel satisfied knowing that she is assisting a person. She can have a look at the mentors who have had a lot of success in the past.
To know more about Mentor visit:
brainly.com/question/29216256
#SPJ4
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Your question is incomplete. You forgot to include the question and also the options.
However, doing some research, we can answer the following.
The correct question should be <em>"Miss Kempt's strategies that actually contribute to Haley's behavior include all of the following except:"</em>
If that is the case, then the correct answer is "understanding that the interaction between Miss Kempt and Haley can impact the learning process."
The other possible question would be<em> "Is Miss Kempt doing anything that actually contributes to Haley's poor behavior?"</em>
If that is the case, the correct answer would be the following.
If the teacher is really yelling at Haley, that clearly is a mistake. However, Dr. Karr has to listen to the teacher's arguments first, before making any decision. There would be a real motive for the way Miss Kempt treat Haley. We do not know if Haley is telling the truth or if he is interpreting the situation to his own convenience. So Dr. Karr has to collect enough evidence before taking any action.
Answer:
being able to learn the guitar?? i don't know. i love my new bf if that counts..
Explanation:
Answer:
Violence and the threat of violence limits the the women and lgbtq community members from voicing out their opinion by making them scared to do so.
Explanation:
There are 2 basic ways to defeat an argument. You can either provide a sound and logical argument that could defeat your oposition's , or you can prevent your opposition from making the argument in the first place.
Violence and the threat of violence is one way to win with the second option. They make those who are oppressed forced to keep their opinion to themselves and eventually let themselves trapped in a social sitgma controlled by the opposition.
