Answer: $178,000
Explanation:
The following information can be derived from the question:
We have to first calculate the total manufacturing cost. This will be:
Direct material 29000
Add: Direct labor 58000
Add: manufacturing overhead 82000
Then the manufacturing cost will be:
= 29000 + 58000 + 82000
= 169000
We then add the beginning work in progress and then subtract the ending work in progress. This will be:
Manufacturing cost = 169000
Add: Beginning WIP = 66000
Less: Ending WIP = 57000
= 169000 + 66000 - 57000
= $178,000
The answer is: Angel investor
Angel investors only injected their capital with the businesses if they believe that the leaders are capable in making the decision by their own.
This hands-off approach in investments tend to be reall risky. But Angel investors tend to be wealthy enough to the point where they can afford the financial blow back even if a couple of their start up investments fail.
Answer:
<em>a)Corrected net income= $97,000</em>
<em>b) Total assets figure is understated.</em>
Explanation:
<em>To arrive at the net income, cost of goods sold is usually deducted from the sales revenue. An cost of sold is determined by subtracting the value of inventory. So an understated inventory would mean an overstated </em><em>cost of goods sold </em><em>and </em><em>understated net income</em>
<em>Correct net income = 90,000 + 7,000</em>
<em> = $97,000</em>
<em>Inventory is part of current assets s reported in the balance sheet . Therefore, if inventory is understated it implies that the current assets figure is understated and therefore the</em><em> total assets figure is understated.</em>
<em />
Answer:
Employers will look to see which workers are applying themselves. They want workers who are flexible, have good attitudes, are loyal to their company, practice good judgement, and are unselfish. Workers who go out and do work that is not formally assigned to them and expand the scope of their responsibilities are rewarded with promotions. Workers who maintain extensive professional networks and learn new skills are also prime candidates for promotion.
Answer from the person who asked the question.
Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
