Answer:
Please see below
Explanation:
Given that:
Number of chairs sold = 35,000
Cost per chair $79
The cost of goods sold that must be eliminated from the consolidated
= Number of chairs sold × Cost per chair
= 35,000 × $90
= $2,765,000
Therefore, for computing the cost of goods sold to be eliminated, we simply multiply the number of chairs sold with cost per chair.
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
At the end of a common agreement, there is no consequence for any of the parties, since it is their will to end the contract that they previously agreed to sign
Termination of the lease by the lessor.
The lessor may unilaterally terminate the lease under the conditions established by law, paying any compensation that may arise.
The law expressly establishes when and why the lease can be terminated by the lessor, and only in those cases can the contract be terminated without there being room for the payment of a penal clause or non-compliance, if any, since in those cases the law in particular established how and why to terminate the contract, and set the penalties to which there is room.
It can be deduced that the number of blankets that must be sold in order for the company to achieve the target profit is 40000.
<h3>How to calculate the target profit</h3>
From the information, Blissful Blankets' target profit is $520,000 and each blanket has a contribution margin of $21. Fixed costs are $320,000.
Therefore, the number of blankets that must be sold to achieve the target profit will be:
= (520000+320000)/21
= 40000
Learn more about profit on:
brainly.com/question/1078746
Answer:
A. The government lowers tax rates and undertakes a replacement of old bridges and roads
B. The government lowers tax rates and issues a partial refund of taxes that have already been paid
These 2 statements are correct explained below
Explanation:
A. The government lowers tax rates and undertakes a replacement of old bridges and roads, this statement is correct because when the government lowers tax rates it means that people have higher disposable income on their hands therefore they can spend more which increases demand, and people also invest more which increases supply, also the replacement of bridges and roads is improvement in infrastructure and this also increases supply as transportation is easier and cheaper for businesses.
B. The government lowers tax rates and issues a partial refund of taxes that have already been paid, this statement is correct because when the government lowers tax rates it means that people have higher disposable income on their hands therefore they can spend more which increases demand, and people also invest more which increases supply, also refund of taxes will increase the disposable money that people have so they can invest and consume both which will increase both supply and demand.
C. The government raises tax rates and reduces unemployment insurance payment
This is contraction fiscal policy and will do the opposite of expansionary fiscal policy, that is why this statement is incorrect.
D. The Federal Reserve increases the money supply and lowers the interest rate while the government simultaneously reduces future taxes. This statement is wrong because lowering the interest rate is an expansionary monetary policy and not an expansionary fiscal policy.
It is a <u>False </u>statment to say that subsection (D) of section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act mandate that the court review the merits of every construction of a contract. The act speaks to Arbitration.
<h3>What does the Federal Arbitration Act of the United States of America say?</h3>
Subsection (D) of section 10 of the above stated Act state that the United States Court would vacate an award upon application by any of the party to the arbitration:
<em>Where the arbitrators exceeded their power or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.</em>
See the link below for more about Arbitration:
brainly.com/question/1139969
