Answer:
Americans piled into the metal as protection from the collapsing value of the dollar. But since the 1970s, the government has enacted a series of laws that have made owning gold more difficult, more costly, and less private.
Explanation:
:D
Answer: the correct answer is B. Tax depreciation for the period exceeds book depreciation.
Answer:
Company should continue with old machine (Alternative 1)
Explanation:
Preparation of a differential analysis dated April 11 on whether to continue with the old machine (Alternative 1) or replace the old machine (Alternative 2)
DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS
Continue with old machine(Alternative 1) ; Replace with old machine(Alternative 2); Differential effect on income
REVENUES
Proceeds from sale of machine
$0 $50500 $50500
COSTS
Purchase price $0 -$75000 -$75000
Direct labor -$56000 -$37000 19000
(11200*5 = -56000)
(7400*5 = -37000)
Income (loss) -$56000 -$61500 -$5500
Based on the above differential analysis the Company should continue with OLD MACHINE (Alternative 1)
The different elements of working capital are <u>current current asset and current liabilities</u>. The management of a business entity might take <u>ratio analysis</u> to reduce the cycle.
Working capital management assists in sustaining the smooth operation of the net operating cycle, otherwise called the cash conversion cycle.
<h3>What is working capital management?</h3>
Working capital management is a business strategy formulated to ensure that an organisation functions efficiently by overseeing and utilizing its current assets and liabilities to their most effective use.
Therefore, learn more about working capital management: brainly.com/question/28287025
#SPJ1
Answer: Yes they did.
Explanation:
Apparent Authority refers to a scenario where a Agent is assumed to have the power to act on behalf of a Principal regardless of if said authority had not being expressly given whether implicitly or otherwise.
It is worthy of note that this power is only valid if the third party in the transaction assumes from the conduct of the agent, that they have such powers to act.
It is stated in the text that there was no question that the brokers had the actual or implied authority to sell the stock meaning that the Principal had not done enough to show that the agents did not have the Authority to act as they did. For this reason, they can indeed be sued under the Principle of Apparent Authority.