Answer:
$8750.87
Explanation:
This is compound interest problem. The formula used to solve this would be:
Where
F is the future value (what we want, after 3 years)
P is the initial value (given 6900)
r is the rate of interest per period
here, 8% per year, so 8/4 = 2% per period (since compounded per quarter)
t is the time (3 years and compounding per year so times of compounding is 3*4 = 12), so t = 12
Substituting, we get our answer:
<u>There will be about $8750.87 at the account at the end of 3 years!</u>
Explanation:
Compare and Contrast ->
Roles of the federal government -> Promoter & Regulator of industrial growth
U.S.Government => Promoter & Regulator of industrial growth
Pacific Railway Act (1862)-They have been granted 20 square miles of land per 1 mile of the track laid down. It strongly encouraged the construction of transcontinental railway lines, contributing to five different transcontinental roads: Union Pacific RR, Central Pacific RR, South Pacific RR, North Pacific RR and the Great North. The Grants Act of Morrill Land (1862)-gave state free land.
U.S.Government => Roles of the federal government
Sherman Antitrust Act (1890)The purpose was to promote economic competition through the regulation of shares, cartels and monopolies. It was very uncompromisingly applied Interstate Trade Act (1887). It also prohibits discrimination against shippers and pays more on the same train for shorter routes than for longer routes.
Thesis:
In the 19th Century and in themid-19th Century, the government of the United States was much more a proponent of industrialisation then an industrialisation regulator than a regulator.
In the year 1862, for instance, congress took place on the Pacific Railway Act, which gave the railway lines 20 acres per mile. This eventually culminated in five transcontinental trains: Union Pacific Railways, Central Pacific Railways, North American Railways, South Pacific Railways, and the Great North.In end, this resulted in the creation of booming towns in the west, encouraging manufacturers to relocate to their inhabitants and enabling businesses to sell their products to remote locations that were once hard to reach. Congress also enacted Morrill's 1861 Tariff Act which substituted for a higher tariff for the limited import tariff inserted in 1816. This shielded businesses from foreign competitors and increased their profits so that they could increase their power. The US government in general has been a more aggressive manufacturing supporter.
They do it by calculating the interest payments I believe. Hope this helped.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Who will get the goods and services produced? (Economic questions: what, how, and for whom?)
Answer:
The political argument against outsourcing practiced by U.S. firms can be summarized in three arguments:
Explanation:
The trade balance argument: this factor is both economic and political, and those who agree with it argue that outsourcing contributes to the decline of American exports while raising the amount of imports at the same time, since those goods and services produced abroad by outsourcing have to be imported to the U.S. if they are to be consumed by American consumeres.
The American worker argument: outsourcing creates a job loss in the U.S. that affects American workers, specially those without a tertiary education. Those who agree with this argument state that outsourcing increases economic inequality, urban decay, rates of mental disease and drug use, and so on.
The national security argument: this argument applies to specific industries like the weapon industry or pharmaceutical. Supporters of this argument say that there are several industries and economic sectors that should not be outsourced on the basis of national security.