Answer:
Ecological Validity
Explanation:
According to my research on different research methodology, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this study is lacking in Ecological Validity. This refers to to the extent to which the findings of a research study are able to be generalized to real-life settings. This is because like mentioned in the question this study is addressing a situation that does not happen in everyday life therefore it cannot be generalized to a real-life settings.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
I listen to a song about 8-10 times before u get tired of it. And these times would be on different days. But later on, after bejng tired of it, j still play back again to get the freshness.
For rereading a good book, it takes about 2 tines before I get tired of it. Because most of the info are already familiar to me and I don't find it interesting again
The maximum number of times I can watch a movie is twice. Because it won't be interesting and captivating as it should be.
<u>Answer:</u>
This is an example of self-serving bias.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- In such self serving bias, people usually take credits or attribute positive things to their own.
- On the contrary, they can easily blame others for negative events.
- Thus, when Penny got the acting job, she made herself responsible, boasting about her own caliber.
- However, when she failed to take the next acting work, she blamed the casting director.
- There may be a reason that she may not had done her previous work with perfection, but self serving bias didn’t let the person evaluate that.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
According to psychologist Albert Bandura’s social cognitive theory, self-efficacy determines the development of personality. Self-efficacy is the belief of an individual in his ability and skill to deal with challenges of everyday life. These beliefs in oneself determine how people think and react to the situations lying ahead of them. It determines the success of a person in a particular situation.
Question:
Why do you think Lincoln didn't end slavery in the north?
Answer:
The proclamation didn't end slavery because it didn't affect the border slave states that weren't in rebellion, and it had no immediate effect in most of the deep South because, at least on the day it was issued, the slaves were in territory still controlled by the Confederacy.
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The nation’s founding fathers, who also struggled with how to address slavery, did not explicitly write the word “slavery” in the Constitution, but they did include key clauses protecting the institution, including a fugitive slave clause and the three-fifths clause, which allowed Southern states to count enslaved people for the purposes of representation in the federal government.
In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system.
Abolitionists, by contrast, knew exactly what should be done about it: Slavery should be immediately abolished, and freed enslaved people should be incorporated as equal members of society. They didn’t care about working within the existing political system, or under the Constitution, which they saw as unjustly protecting slavery and enslavers. Leading abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison called the Constitution “a covenant with death and an agreement with Hell,” and went so far as to burn a copy at a Massachusetts rally in 1854.
-Alan Becker
