1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
madam [21]
3 years ago
5

In a state court of general jurisdiction in State A, a debtor, who was a resident of State A, brought suit against a lender, who

was an alien with permanent residency status in State B, for violation of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The lender waived personal jurisdiction. Under state procedural rules, venue was proper in the state court. The lender timely removed the action to the federal court for the Northern District of State A, which was the district in which the state court sat. The lender then timely moved to dismiss the action for improper venue, noting that, had the action initially been brought in federal court, the federal court for the Northern District of State A would not have had proper venue over this action. How should the court rule on this motion
Law
1 answer:
Allushta [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Hi my name is dad

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The Virginia plan advocates an improved and stronger national government to preserve the unity of the United States. Some of the
Evgesh-ka [11]

Explanation:

when she home all alone all she do is twerk

7 0
3 years ago
In what 3 instances is the federal government always supreme to the States?
SpyIntel [72]

The government of the United States, then, though limited in its powers, is supreme. And its laws, when made in pursuance of the constitution, form the supreme law of the land, anything in the constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

6 0
3 years ago
There are many examples of police misconduct. Explain at least two reasons that could cause an honest officer to violate the law
Sergio [31]

Answer:

Usually, the police tend to respect the rights of citizens and behave according to the rules of their profession, without overreaching and protecting citizens and their rights.

But on some occasions, police officers can overstep their roles and violate some constitutional rights of citizens, whether conscientiously or not.

In the latter case, the police often overstep their duties without the intention of doing so, but as a consequence of the situations to which they are exposed. Thus, for example, more than once a police officer has mistakenly shot a suspect who was in the middle of a persecution operation or at a crime scene, or even many times the police have arrested people who were not committing any crime, just for the simple fact of being suspicious.

4 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP! ╰(*°▽°*)╯(*゜ー゜*)U•ェ•*U ¯\(°_o)/¯
m_a_m_a [10]
Answer:
B

Step by step explanation:
In picture.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A spouse can be provided information such as hospital
Nana76 [90]

Answer:

Social Security number and Marriage contact

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the most serious offense committed in this scenario (crime)?
    6·1 answer
  • How many Special Agent Entry Programs does the FBI have for applicants? 6 3 5 4
    5·1 answer
  • Match this weakness of the Articles of Confederation to the outcome it caused:
    14·1 answer
  • One tip to avoid "Road Rage" is not to confront other drivers or make obscene gestures.
    13·2 answers
  • How do lobbyist affect voters? Minimum 3 paragraphs
    5·1 answer
  • What force would a baseball exert if gravity pulls it down and its mass is 8 kg?​
    11·1 answer
  • 2. A study of plaque buildup on teeth used three randomly
    12·1 answer
  • Let's be the friends​
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following are advantages to societies who provide freedom of speech?
    5·1 answer
  • What are the ways in which media can ensure access of information to all communities
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!