Answer:
a. Whataburger is not using the optimal cost-minimizaing mix of cashier and kiosks.
b. Whataburger should hire more cashier and rent fewer kiosks in order to improve its mix of inputs and minimize the cost
Explanation:
a. According to the given data we have the following:
Let "C" is a cashier.
"K" is a kiosk
MPC = 48 (Marginal Product of Cashier)
MPK = 32 (Marginal Product of Kiosk)
PC = $15 (cashier can be hired for a wage of $15)
PK = $12 (Kiosk rents for $12)
At optimal cost minimization point, (MPC / MPK) = (PC / PK)
(MPC / PC) = (MPK / PK)
(MPC / PC) = (48 / 15) = 3.2
(MPK / PK) = (32 / 12) = 2.67
Since the (MPC / PC) and (MPK / PK) is not equal. It implies Whataburger is not using the optimal cost-minimizaing mix of cashier and kiosks.
b. We have to use the following:
(MPC / PC) > (MPK / PK)
i.e., 3.2 > 2.67
It means Whataburger hire more cashier and rent fewer kiosks in order to improve its mix of inputs and minimize the cost.
Answer:
product B
Explanation:
The computation is shown below;
<u>Particulars Product A Product B Product C
</u>
Selling Price $5.00 $3.00 $5.00
Less: Variable cost per unit ($3.50) ($2.00) ($2.00)
Contribution per unit $1.50 $1.00 $3.00
Machine hours per unit 0.75 0.25 1
Contribution per machine hour $2.00 $4.00 $3.00
($1.50 ÷ 0.75) ($1.00 ÷ 0.25) ($3.00 ÷ 1)
The product B should be produced as it has the highest contribution per machine hour
IT IS LETTER C BECAUSE THE OTHER ONES HAVE NOTHING TO DO
Answer: D. The spending and taxing policies used by the government to influence the economy
Explanation:
Fiscal policy is simply the application of government spending/expenditures and revenue/taxing policies to influence the economy of a nation.
A because scarcity in economics mean having limited resources and unlimited wants, meaning there’s never enough resources to satisfy the needs that every individual wants
