Answer:
subsititution
Explanation:
Since in the situation it is mentioned that margot has fallen with 3 set bedroom i.e. 2500 square foot and its amount is $400,000. Now there is another three set bedroom of 2,400 square foot and its amount is $350,000 so here two options are given and according to the price he opted for the second property
So out of two choices he should opt for one that means it is a subsititution economic principle
Considering the scenario described above, at the store, I am an employee. This is because I'm hired full-time.
Also, because an office manager is supervising me, that shows I am an employee.
Also, given that I work within normal business hours at the store, that is a characteristic of an employee. Again, payment of wages is associated with employee relations.
On the other hand, I work as an independent contractor at the pub because I decide the music to play and get paid per gig.
Also, given that I don't work at normal hours and get paid at a lump sum, this is an independent contractor working feature.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that I worked as an independent contractor at the pub and an employee at the store.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20834227
Answer:
Disposible income.
Marginal propensity to consume.
Disposible income, marginal propensity to consume.
The consumption will increase by $800
Explanation:
The consumption function shows the relationship between consumption spending and disposible income.
The slope of the consumption function is the marginal propensity to consume.
Changes in consumption can be predicted by multiplying the change in disposible income by the marginal propensity to consume.
Given: MPC = 0.80
Disposible income increases by $1,000
consumption increase = 0.80*$1000
= $800
Therefore, The consumption will increase by $800.
Answer:
You can say it through a text, a phone call, an email, or a letter.
Explanation:
Answer:
Multiplier effect in the 4th round = 3.58
Explanation:
A change in aggregate demand can create a much greater impact in the equilibrium national income. This is known as the multiplier effect. This occurs when injections of new demand for goods and services into the circular flow of income creates further rounds of spending. For example, if the government spending was on building new affordable houses then the need for housing materials will create demand for wood, cement and other housing supplies. Thus, these businesses will see a rise in sales. Whilst they benefit through profits, their employees would benefit from wages and salaries. As their income rises, they will spend it in the economy, and so will the businesses from their profits. This additional rounds of spending is the multiplier effect.
If a 100 increase creates 33 for the second round, it is 33% (33/100 x 100) i.e. 100 x 33% = 33
This is proven since 33 x 33% = 10.89 in the third round.
Hence, the multiplier effect in the forth round = 10.89 x 33% = 3.58
