Answer:
They built those kind of palaces because they wanted to showcase their power and prestige. Es Escorial in particular was built by Philiph II, one of the most important kings in Spanish history, who presided over the rule of the Spanish Empire when it was in expansion.
These kind of palaces could also instill fear on political opponents, and this is another reason why practically every European powerful monarch built a palace like El Escorial in their respective countries.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
He would applaud the author for arguing in favor of a passive approach to racial equality.
We do not want the men of another color for our brothers-in-law, but we do want them for our brothers.
According to the statement above we can explain that they really want a mixed color family, although those men are brother-in-law, they are parts of the family, really brothers in heart same way.
Tries and confirms the charge.
I think they can, because depending on how much the person has to offer it can provide tough facts for political viewpoints.
<u>Answer</u>: The <u>Legalists </u>philosophers believed that every aspect of life should be governed by strict and impersonal laws.
The Legalism is the third intellectual current that flourished in China before the unification by the Qin Dynasty. The three centuries before the unification were so rich in terms of political thought that is known as “The Golden Age of Chinese Philosophy” with “The Hundred Schools” of thoughts. Other famous schools in this period are Confucianism and Taoism.
The long period of war were times of great chaos and disorder. Profound changes happened during these three centuries – economical, military and social changes. A new administrative approach needed to arise and the Legalists were at the forefront of this innovation.
Legalism is the most practical current of that period. Legalists would not focus on philosophical speculations, such as the evolution of the human nature, morality or divine will. Instead, they focus on how to achieve the goal of unification. Nothing, not even the past, could distract them of this goal. Because of that, they defended that the past doesn’t teach a thing and doesn’t shape the present or the future, but a radical change in the present is the only way to restructure the society. This change could only happen by “the rule of the law”, where individual morality of the ruled and the rulers are not taken into consideration. They believed that every aspect of life should be governed by strict and impersonal laws. Applying those is the radical change that would create a powerful government, able to coerce its subjects and install a rich state and a powerful army. In that scenario, the state has the ultimate authority and such power is given to it by means of military strength.
