Answer:
<em><u>constitutional law: </u></em>Constitutional law is a body of law that defines the role, powers, and structure of different entities within a state, namely, the executive, the parliament or legislature, and the judiciary.
<u><em>statutory law:</em></u> Statutory law or statute law is written law passed by a body of the legislature. This is as opposed to oral or customary law, or regulatory law promulgated by the executive or common law of the judiciary. Statutes may originate with national, state legislatures, or local municipalities.
<u><em>case law:</em></u> Case law is the collection of past legal decisions written by courts and similar tribunals in the course of deciding cases, in which the law was analyzed using these cases to resolve ambiguities for deciding current cases. These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent.
<u><em>common law:</em></u> In law, common law is the body of law created by judges and similar quasi-judicial tribunals by virtue of being stated in written opinions. The defining characteristic of “common law” is that it arises as precedent.
Explanation:
I hope that this answer helps you to understand your questions more thoroughly. If you have any further questions, please ask them below.
Have a great rest of your day/night!
ANSWER:
The state which chose not to vote on accepting the Declaration of Independence was New York.
The answer to your question is
508
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
Answer:
The answer is- Identifying the question
Explanation:
The Steps of a scientific investigation include;
- Identifying a research question or problem,
- Forming a hypothesis,
- Gathering evidence,
- Analyzing evidence,
- Deciding whether the evidence supports the hypothesis,
- Drawing conclusions
- Communicating the results.
In undergoing a scientific investigation, one has to begin with asking questions. Sometime the questions could arise as a result of something observed or just out of curiosity. Asking questions can help to gather a list of involved parties and give hints or leads as to what is being investigated.
Questions are asked in order to gain more knowledge as regards what is being investigated.
The act of Brandon questioning people has completed the first part of the steps in scientific investigation which is identifying a research.
