The type of executive branch nominations, including those for Cabinet members, ambassadors, and White House personnel, will determine if there will be a clash with the Senate.
<h3>Potential for Conflict with Senate</h3>
Although Senate confirmation serves as a crucial check on the president's appointment authority, life-tenured judicial nominations have the capacity to have a lasting impact.
The president's policy ambitions and executive actions frequently clash with the goals of Congress.
With life-tenured judicial appointments, such as Supreme Court justices, the stakes are extremely high because the president has the chance to continue to have influence even after taking office. In contrast, White House staff posts are frequently more simpler to fill and do not require Senate confirmation.
To accomplish policy objectives, the president uses executive orders and policy initiatives, both of which have the potential to escalate tensions with Congress. Because presidential orders can be used to make laws without the consent or input of Congress.
Because of the approach that benefits from running the
emergency relief program, it cause Harry Hopkin to have a position in the organization
in which he is appointed to be the head in terms of the work’s progress
administration that will not only benefit the organization but also him.
Supreme court can check the power of Congress. The separation and sharing of powers means that government cannot reach decisions quickly. Advantage: So that the government can think the decisions thoroughly before it can be passed and become a law.
The functionalist point of see states that frameworks exist in society for unimaginable reasons. Fight analysts watch that stratification impels lopsidedness, such as between well off trade proprietors and down and out laborers. Conventional interactionists see at stratification from a micro-level point of see.
