All categories

2 years ago

Someone please help asap.. what even is this. ill give brainliest

Mathematics

1 answer:

jasenka [17]2 years ago

6 0

Congruency property relates to two or more triangles with similar dimensions, and internal angles. So that the required statements to complete the proof are:

1. definition of a straight angle.

2. subtraction property of equality

3. corresponding sides of similar triangles are proportional

4. transitive property of equality.

The intersection of two or more lines forms a number of angles which depends on the number of lines involved. These angles formed may have similar or different properties.

When two or more triangles have similar lengths of sides and measure internal angles, it can be said that they are congruent. Thus they have some common properties.

Therefore, the appropriate statements to answer the given question are stated below:

Definition of a straight angle.
Subtraction property of equality.
Corresponding sides of similar triangles are proportional.
Transitive property of equality.

For more clarifications on the properties of congruent triangles, visit: brainly.com/question/15835221

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

PLEASEHELP!

denis-greek [22]

You factor out primes from the root, for example:
root 100
you can get 10 from it, or we'll use 5

100/5=20
20/5=4
root 4= 2
because there are 2 "5" we can bring that out of the root, there are 2 "2" so we bring that out too.
When a number is taking out of a root, the 2 exact same numbers become one. in this case, there are ONE 5 and ONE 2 outside the root. then You multiply 5 and 2 together, and you get 10

6 0

3 years ago

if a bag contains 16 red ,4yellow,20blue,8white balloons, what is the part-to-whole ratio of red balloons to all balloons

TEA [102]

Its 16/48 i hope this helps

5 0

3 years ago

How do I find the value of x

Kaylis [27]

Answer:

The angles inside a hexagon add up to 720.

105 + 88 + 142 + 140 + 124 + x = 720

720 - (105 + 88 + 142 + 140 + 124) = x

720 - 599 = x

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How many nonzero terms of the Maclaurin series for ln(1 x) do you need to use to estimate ln(1.4) to within 0.001?

Vilka [71]

Answer:

The estimate of In(1.4) is the first five non-zero terms.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the given information:

We are to find the estimate of In(1 . 4) within 0.001 by applying the function of the Maclaurin series for f(x) = In (1 + x)

So, by the application of Maclurin Series which can be expressed as:

$f(x) = f(0) + \dfrac{xf'(0)}{1!}+ \dfrac{x^2 f"(0)}{2!}+ \dfrac{x^3f'(0)}{3!}+... \ \ \ \ \ --- (1)$

Let examine f(x) = In(1+x), then find its derivatives;

f(x) = In(1+x)

$f'(x) = \dfrac{1}{1+x}$

f'(0) $= \dfrac{1}{1+0}=1$

f ' ' (x) $= \dfrac{1}{(1+x)^2}$

f ' ' (x) $= \dfrac{1}{(1+0)^2}=-1$

f ' ' '(x) $= \dfrac{2}{(1+x)^3}$

f ' ' '(x) $= \dfrac{2}{(1+0)^3} = 2$

f ' ' ' '(x) $= \dfrac{6}{(1+x)^4}$

f ' ' ' '(x) $= \dfrac{6}{(1+0)^4}=-6$

f ' ' ' ' ' (x) $= \dfrac{24}{(1+x)^5} = 24$

f ' ' ' ' ' (x) $= \dfrac{24}{(1+0)^5} = 24$

Now, the next process is to substitute the above values back into equation (1)

$f(x) = f(0) + \dfrac{xf'(0)}{1!}+ \dfrac{x^2f' \ '(0)}{2!}+\dfrac{x^3f \ '\ '\ '(0)}{3!}+\dfrac{x^4f '\ '\ ' \ ' \(0)}{4!}+\dfrac{x^5f' \ ' \ ' \ ' \ '0)}{5!}+ ...$

$In(1+x) = o + \dfrac{x(1)}{1!}+ \dfrac{x^2(-1)}{2!}+ \dfrac{x^3(2)}{3!}+ \dfrac{x^4(-6)}{4!}+ \dfrac{x^5(24)}{5!}+ ...$

$In (1+x) = x - \dfrac{x^2}{2}+\dfrac{x^3}{3}-\dfrac{x^4}{4}+\dfrac{x^5}{5}- \dfrac{x^6}{6}+...$

To estimate the value of In(1.4), let's replace x with 0.4

$In (1+x) = x - \dfrac{x^2}{2}+\dfrac{x^3}{3}-\dfrac{x^4}{4}+\dfrac{x^5}{5}- \dfrac{x^6}{6}+...$

$In (1+0.4) = 0.4 - \dfrac{0.4^2}{2}+\dfrac{0.4^3}{3}-\dfrac{0.4^4}{4}+\dfrac{0.4^5}{5}- \dfrac{0.4^6}{6}+...$

Therefore, from the above calculations, we will realize that the value of $\dfrac{0.4^5}{5}= 0.002048$ as well as $\dfrac{0.4^6}{6}= 0.00068267$ which are less than 0.001

Hence, the estimate of In(1.4) to the term is $\dfrac{0.4^5}{5}$ is said to be enough to justify our claim.

∴

The estimate of In(1.4) is the first five non-zero terms.

8 0

3 years ago

Sita and Radha purchased a car for rupees 320000 due to some economic problem they sold it for 280000.find the loss incured and

musickatia [10]

Answer:

40000 and 12.5% respectively

Step-by-step explanation:

soln:

given,

cost price(c.p)=320000

selling price(s.p)=280000

loss(l),loss percentage(l%)=?

we know,

l=c.p-s.p

or,l=320000-280000

•°•l=40000

now,

l%=l/c.p*100%

or,l%=40000/320000*100%

•°•l%=12.5%

6 0

3 years ago