Students will eat all of their lunches instead of throwing them away. Lunches would cost more money. Students learn better when
they aren't hungry. If more people bought lunches, more people would need to be hired. Students will want to come to school for the good lunches. Students only want junk food. Which of these arguments do you think would be the most effective if you were arguing for better school lunches?
remote means having very little connection with or relationship to. so the thing is remote meaning its never had any actual connection to anything making it fearful.
