1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
baherus [9]
1 year ago
12

(05.02 MC) Solve 2 log x = log 64. Ox= 1.8 Ox=8 Ox= 32 Ox = 128

Mathematics
1 answer:
RoseWind [281]1 year ago
3 0

Answer:

x = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

2logx=log64\\logx^2=log64

now that both sides has log, you can remove them and leave it as:

x^{2} =64\\

take the square root of both sides:

x = [8, -8]\\x = 8

logarithmic equations can't have negative solutions, plus -8 isn't an option

i hope this helped!

You might be interested in
Help solve for x you ant gotta solve for the other one
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

could you maybe specify a little bit more

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The price of a computer component is decreasing at a rate of 15​% per year. State whether this decrease is linear or exponential
Margaret [11]

Answer:

Since the price is given by an exponential function, the decline in price is exponential.

The component will cost $36.8475 in three years.

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation for the price of a component has the following format:

P(t) = P(0)(1-r)^{t}

In which P(t) is the price after t years, P(0) is the initial price, and r is the rate that the price decreases.

Since the price is given by an exponential function, the decline in price is exponential.

The price of a computer component is decreasing at a rate of 15​% per year.

This means that r = 0.15

Component costs ​$60 ​today

So P(0) = 60. Then

P(t) = P(0)(1-r)^{t}

P(t) = 60(1-0.15)^{t}

P(t) = 60(0.85)^{t}

What will it cost in three​ years?

This is P(3).

P(t) = 60(0.85)^{t}

P(3) = 60(0.85)^{3} = 36.8475

The component will cost $36.8475 in three years.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is false?
kramer

Option D

The sum of two irrational numbers is always rational is false statement

<em><u>Solution:</u></em>

<h3><u>The sum of two rational numbers is always rational</u></h3>

"The sum of two rational numbers is rational."

So, adding two rationals is the same as adding two such fractions, which will result in another fraction of this same form since integers are closed under addition and multiplication. Thus, adding two rational numbers produces another rational number.

For example:

\frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{5} = \frac{9}{20}

rational number + rational number = rational number

Hence this statement is true

<h3><u>The product of a non zero rational number and an irrational number is always irrational</u></h3>

If you multiply any irrational number by the rational number zero, the result will be zero, which is rational.

Any other situation, however, of a rational times an irrational will be irrational.

A better statement would be: "The product of a non-zero rational number and an irrational number is irrational."

So this statement is correct

<h3><u>The product of two rational numbers is always rational</u></h3>

The product of two rational numbers is always rational.

A number is said to be a rational number if it is of the form p/q,where p and q are integers and q ≠ 0

Any integer is a rational number because it can be written in p/q form.

Hence it is clear that product of two rational numbers is always rational.

So this statement is correct

<h3><u>The sum of two irrational numbers is always rational</u></h3>

"The sum of two irrational numbers is SOMETIMES irrational."

The sum of two irrational numbers, in some cases, will be irrational. However, if the irrational parts of the numbers have a zero sum (cancel each other out), the sum will be rational.

Thus this statement is false

5 0
3 years ago
What is the value of x?<br><br> This is the last question I don’t get
Stels [109]

Answer:

The answer is 166

Step-by-step explanation:

x+90+24

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
suppose a population of 250 crickets doubles in size every six months. How many crickets will there be after two years?
lord [1]

double every 6 months 

in 6 months there would be 250*2 = 500 crickets

 in 1 year there would be 500*2 = 1000 crickets

in 1.5 years there would be 1000 *2 = 2000 crickets

 in 2 years there would be 2000 *2 = 4000 crickets

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Drag and drop numbers into the boxes so that the paired values are in a proportional relationship. x 1 5 15 25 y 0.2 1 2 3
    5·1 answer
  • vanissa brought 30 yards of fabric from the craft store. she gave 1/6 of the fabric to her cousin. how much fabric did her cousi
    10·1 answer
  • Find the slope and y intercept of the line below <br><br>Y-9x=1/2
    6·1 answer
  • Solving QE's by factoring
    12·1 answer
  • How do you put a fraction as a mixed number and a whole number
    14·1 answer
  • 67 hundredths in numbers (decimals)
    9·1 answer
  • 4+2i/2−i solve for this expression​
    10·1 answer
  • Consider the right triangular prism. What is the volume of the right triangular prism? O 15 ft O 30 ft? O 150 ft" O 300 ft)​
    11·1 answer
  • Adele rides her bike 28 miles in 3.5 hours. How far has Adele traveled on her bike if she rides for 8 hours?
    12·1 answer
  • Find the slope of<br> the line.<br> [?]<br> Give your answer as<br> a fraction in simplest<br> form.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!