Answer:
The correct answer is A) Lend support to the invisible hand by maintaining property rights and political stability
.
Explanation:
The absence of the government in legislative tasks related to the market is, therefore, one of the main bases of the economic theory developed by Adam Smith throughout his bibliographical work. For Smith, the leaders must deal with other areas of control more focused on defense or justice, leaving the market to its free operation.
The invisible hand presupposes that there is an inertia by which the market and its self-regulation leads individuals to make the best decisions for the majority of the population to achieve well-being. In other words, it is a kind of automatic control mechanism that compensates the actions taken as a whole, regulating social conformations.
Therefore, it is assumed that the self-regulation facilitated to the markets helps to achieve an optimal market. To do this, individuals must behave in such a way that they can act without state mediation and in pursuit of their own interest.
The metaphor of the invisible hand also supposes that individuals are encouraged or held back to produce or not to follow the level of prices that exist in the market. Prices and profits are sufficient indicative to know when to participate in the market or not. Basically, if there is profit in a market niche, this supposes a stimulus for production, while losses lead individuals to quit.
Based on the information given the predetermined overhead rate is 31.89 per direct labor hour.
<h3>Predetermined overhead rate</h3>
Using this formula
Predetermined Overhead rate = Estimated manufacturing overhead / Estimated total labor hours
Let plug in the formula
Predetermined Overhead rate = [$1,026,260 + (46,000×6.25)] / 41,200
Predetermined Overhead rate =1,313,760/ 41,200
Predetermined Overhead rate = 31.89 per direct labor hour
Inconclusion the predetermined overhead rate is 31.89 per direct labor hour.
Learn more about predetermined overhead rate here:brainly.com/question/26372929
Answer:
b) If auditors can demonstrate due diligence.
Explanation:
Under the liability provisions of section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, auditors may be liable to any purchaser of a security for certifying materially misstated financial statements that are included in the registration statement. Under section 11, auditors usually will not be liable to the purchaser if auditors can demonstrate due diligence.
Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77k (1988), provides investors with the ability to hold issuers and others liable for any damage incurred and caused by false statements of fact or even material omissions of fact within registration statements as at when effective.
The Securities Act of 1933 was used to regulate the stock market as the first federal legislation. With this act, power was given to the federal government and taken away from the state governments.
Hence, the Securities Act of 1933 is used to protect investors from frauds by creating a set of standard rules.
In conclusion, auditors usually will not be liable to the purchaser if auditors can demonstrate due diligence in their services and responsibilities.