Ask question

Ask question

All categories

1 year ago

11

_____________ is a condition in which the quality, variety, and/or desirability of the diet is reduced and there is difficulty a

t times providing enough food for everyone in the household.

1 answer:

d1i1m1o1n [39]1 year ago

5 0

The answer is “ Food insecure” I hope this answer will help you.

You might be interested in

Chae Corporation uses the weighted-average method in its process costing system. This month, the beginning inventory in the firs

nasty-shy [4]

Answer:

If costs and percentage completion of these units in beginning inventory were:

Cost Percent Complete

Materials costs $7,900 60%

Conversion costs $6,900 30%

A total of 8,100 units were started and 7,600 units were transferred to the second processing department during the month. The following costs were incurred in the first processing department during the month:

Materials costs $137,900

Conversion costs $323,900

The ending inventory was 80% complete with respect to materials and 75% complete with respect to conversion costs.

Note: Your answers may differ from those offered below due to rounding error. In all cases, select the answer that is the closest to the answer you computed. To reduce rounding error, carry out all computations to at least three decimal places.

The cost per equivalent unit for materials for the month in the first processing department is closest to $17.03

Explanation:

Weighted-average method is used to make an inventory valuation, taking average values for both the merchandise in stock and for the costs of merchandise sold.

But in this case, since you have unfinished units, you must take the equivalent to calculate the unit cost.

Materials:

Units completed: 7,600

Units in process: 1,200 * 80% = 960

Equivalent production units: 7,600 +, 960 = 8560

Cost at start: 7,900

Added costs in the period: 137,900

Total cost: 7900 + 137,900 = 145,800

So: 145,800 / 8,560 = 17.03 is the equivalent unit cost per product

4 0

3 years ago

A lottery winner can take $6 million now or be paid $600,000 at the end of each of the next 16 years. The winner calculates the

Semmy [17]

Answer:

Yes, her decision was correct because of Net present value rule.

Explanation:

the net present value (NPV) applies to a series of cash flows occurring at different times.

The present value of a cash flow depends on the interval of time between now and the cash flow. It also depends on the discount rate. NPV accounts for the time value of money. It provides a method for evaluating and comparing capital projects or financial products with cash flows spread over time, as in loans, investments, payouts from insurance contracts plus many other applications.

Time value of money dictates that time affects the value of cash flows.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

After visiting several automobile dealerships, Richard selects the car he wants. He likes its $11,500 price, but financing throu

WITCHER [35]

Answer:

The answers are:

A) total interest = p x r x t

where:

p = $9,200
r = 10%
t = 2 years

total interest = $9,200 x 10% x 2 = $1,840

B) the total cost of the car = down payment + principal + total interest

total cost = $2,300 + $9,200 + $1,840 = $13,340

C) monthly payment = (principal + total interest) / total number of payments

monthly payment = ($9,200 + $1,840) / (12 x 2) = $11,040 / 24 = $460

D) APR = (total payments x total interest) / [principal x (total payments +1)]

APR = (24 x $1,840) / ($9,200 x 25) = 0.192 or 19.2%

5 0

3 years ago

Production data: Pounds in process, May 1; materials 100% complete; conversion 90% complete 88,000 Pounds started into productio

Zarrin [17]

Answer:

1. materials = 569,000 units , conversion = 556,000 units

2. materials = $1.15 , conversion = $0.70

3. materials = $44,850 , conversion = $18,200 , total = $63,050

Explanation:

For this question, i will assume that the <em>Weighted Average Cost Method</em> is used since we do not have information on the specific method applied by this company.

<u>Calculation of the equivalent units of production for materials and conversion</u>.

1. Materials

Closing Work in Process (65,000 × 60%) = 39,000

Completed and Transferred to Finished Goods = 530,000

Equivalent units of production for materials = 569,000

2. Conversion Costs

Closing Work in Process (65,000 × 40%) = 26,000

Completed and Transferred to Finished Goods = 530,000

Equivalent units of production for materials = 556,000

<u>Calculation of the cost per equivalent unit for materials and conversion</u>

Remember :

<em>Cost per equivalent unit = Total Costs ÷ Total Equivalent units</em>

<em>therefore,</em>

1. Materials

Cost per equivalent unit = ($ 106,000 + $ 551,120) ÷ 569,000

= $1.15

2. Conversion Costs

Cost per equivalent unit = ($ 59,700 + $ 328,230) ÷ 556,000

= $0.70

<u>Calculation of the cost of ending work in process inventory for materials, conversion, and in total</u>

Materials ($1.15 × 39,000) = $44,850

Conversion Costs ($0.70 × 26,000) = $18,200

Total cost of ending work in process = $63,050

3 0

3 years ago

High Country, Inc., produces and sells many recreational products. The company has just opened a new plant to produce a folding

ANTONII [103]

The difference in the ending inventory relates to a difference in the handling of fixed manufacturing overhead costs.

Under variable costing, these costs have been expensed in full as period costs.

Under absorption costing, these costs have been added to units of a product at the rate of $10 per unit ($100,000/10,000 units produced = $10 per unit).

Thus, under absorption costing a portion of the $100,000 fixed manufacturing overhead cost for the month has been added to the inventory account rather than expensed on the income statement:

Added to the ending inventory:

(2,000 units x $10 per unit) $ 20,000

Expensed as part of the cost of goods sold:

(8,000 units $10 per unit) $ 80,000

Total fixed manufacturing overhead cost for the month: $100,000

Because $20,000 of fixed manufacturing overhead cost has been deferred in inventory under absorption costing, the net operating income reported under that costing method is $20,000 higher than the net operating income under variable costing(refer to the first image)

And for question refer to the second image.

Hence, The difference in the ending inventory relates to a difference in the handling of fixed manufacturing overhead costs.

Learn more about absorption costing:

brainly.com/question/22079536

#SPJ4

4 0

1 year ago