Answer:
WP Corporation
Which of the products should be processed beyond the split-off point? Product X Product Y Product Z
B) yes no yes
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Budgeted data for the next month:
products X Y Z
Units produced 2,400 2,900 3,900
Per unit sales value at split-off $ 21.00 $ 24.00 $ 24.00
Added processing costs per unit $ 3.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00
Per unit sales value if processed further $ 25.00 $ 25.00 $ 30.00
Added profit after further processing $ 1.00 ($4.00) $ 1.00
Further processing of the products X, Y, and Z will yield further or added profit of $1.00 from products X and Z, but a loss of $4 from product Y. Therefore, product Y should not be processed further, unless its cost structure is such that there is a more than $4 profit to be generated and its further processing is necessary for the other two to be sold, that is if the three products must be sold jointly. In such a case, management could take further analysis to reduce the cost for consumers.
Answer:
The correct answer is $112,000.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Home insured = $160,000
Cost to rebuild = $180,000
Personal property coverage = 70%
So, we can calculate the amount of coverage by using following formula:
Amount of coverage = Home insured × Personal property coverage
By putting the value, we get
Amount of coverage = $160,000 × 70%
= $112,000
Option C
Costly to imitate criteria for sustainable competitive advantage
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
Sustainable competitive advantages are business assets, properties, or skills that are hard to replicate or exceed; and render a higher or complimentary long term situation over competitors. A company must produce distinct goals, plans, and methods to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
It needs huge expenditure in time and money to create a brand. It demands very limitedly to destroy it. A good brand is precious because it prompts customers to favor the brand over competitors. A unique product or service increases customer support and is less suitable for a competitor to imitate.
Answer:
The answer is: There was no consumer surplus in this situation.
Explanation:
consumer surplus refers to the difference between the maximum amount a consumer is willing to pay for a good or service and the actual price of the good or service.
In this case there was no consumer surplus, since Stacey was willing to pay only $2 for a bottle of mineral water and its price was $2.25, so she didn't buy it.
<h2>A $4.00 for car wash is good</h2>
Explanation:
Option A: A fancy hair cut option is given but it is not associated with any of the price. So we cannot say it is good or worth for the money.
Option B: It seems to be valid. But when we consider all the given options, there are better options than this.
Option C: Rusted means a brown layer formed on the body of the car. So we cannot say it is good. So this option too is invalid.
Option D: Normally car wash costs $10. It is worth to do a complete car wash with $4.00. This option is the best choice.
