Based on efficiency, the businesses that should cut hair are the A and C; moreover, to meet the demand, each firm will need to offer at least two haircuts.
The supply of a product or the units of a product that is offered to potential customers should always meet the number of real customers. In the same way, the price of the product should meet the price customers are willing to pay.
In this context, the best is that only firm A and C cut hair, this is because their prices per cut ($25 and $30) match the consumers' willingness to pay this includes Lorenzo ($35), Gilberto ($50), Juanita ($40) and Neha ($25).
- Firm A can cut Neha's and Lorenzo's hair
- Firm C can cut Gilberto's and Juanita's hair
Moreover, this implies each firm needs to do at least 2 haircuts to cover all the possible customers.
In the case of firms B and D, the price per cut is high ($40 - $45). Based on this, they should not cut hair as only a few customers can pay for this service, and this would be inefficient.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/13225200
Answer:
Both options C and D are correct.
Explanation:
Inflation refers to an increase in the general price level of goods and services overtime. Since it is conveyed in the question that the general price level in a later year became twice as high, inflation definitely occurred. Hence, option D is correct.
Nominal GDP is the value of the total output at current market prices. Real GDP adjusts that value for inflation. As prices double, nominal GDP ought to increase from $400m to $800m. However, it actually rose to $1000m. This additional increase of $200m shows that the real GDP has risen. However, the increase in real GDP is less than 100%. This implies option C is also correct.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The aztecs were ancient/primitive
Answer: $68,000
Explanation:
If the inventory that remains is the $46,000 then that means that the cars costing $33,000 and $24,000 have been sold.
With specific identification, the actual prices of the stock are used so the cost of goods sold is:
= 24,000 + 33,000
= $57,000
The gross profit is therefore:
= Sales - Cost of goods sold
= 125,000 - 57,000
= $68,000
According to empirical research, in countries where stockholders' rights are strong, firms issue <u>More </u>stock than in countries where stockholders' rights are weak. Researchers conclude that strong stockholders' rights <u>reduce</u> moral hazard in stock markets.
<u>Explanation</u>
A <u>Moral hazard</u> is said to have occurred when one party (i.e insured Party) increases its exposure to risk ,because some other party bears the cost of those Risk.It reflects the tendency of a person to take more risk as the consequence of the risk taken has to be beard by some other party
<u>The moral hazard problem is </u><u>less </u><u> severe in bond markets than in stock markets. In addition, moral hazard arises in bond markets when firms issue bonds with high default risk.</u>
<u />
So it is appropriate to say that , in countries where stockholders' rights are strong, firms issue <u>More </u>stock than in countries where stockholders' rights are weak. Researchers conclude that strong stockholders' rights <u>reduce</u> moral hazard in stock markets.
