Answer:
Hammer would prevail against Kay based on:_______.
A. Unilateral contract.
Explanation:
A unilateral contract is a contract created by an offer that can only be accepted by performance. To form the contract, the party making the offer (called the “offeror”) makes a promise in exchange for the act of performance by the other party.
in relation to the case in the contract, Hammer had carried out the duties expected of him thus making the contract valid under a unilateral contract.
since in a unilateral contract, the offer can only be accepted when the other party completely performs the requested action.
Hence Hammer would prevail against Kay based on Unilateral contract.
Invest into 3D printing organs you will become a million trust me
Answer:
Yes, sales have increased as a result of the advertising campaign.
Explanation:
Find attached the explanation.
Note: I had to convert the explanation into both jpeg and files (both contains the same answer) when the answer box kept on rejecting my answer claiming it contains swear words when it does not.
Answer: $25.50
Explanation:
Intrinsic Value of warrant = Number of shares buyable * (Market price - Warrant price)
= 6 * (14.25 - 10)
= $25.50
Answer:
Cash payments for income tax = $165000
so correct option is C. 165,000
Explanation:
given data
Income tax = $175,000
beginning tax payable = $30,000
end of the year tax payable = $40,000
to find out
Cash payments for income tax reported on the statement of cash flows
solution
we get here Cash payments for income tax that is express as
Cash payments for income tax = Income tax + beginning tax payable - end of the year tax payable ..............................1
put here value we get
Cash payments for income tax = $175000 + $30000 - $40000
Cash payments for income tax = $165000
so correct option is C. 165,000
