Answer:
An Ethical Dilemma Problem
Throughout history it has been the practice in many countries to use convicts in scientific experiments or studies. One research group has developed a chemical that preliminary tests indicate that it will cure a fatal disease that affects many people. This group wants to seek volunteers from the prison population to advance their study. They would administer the chemical to consenting prisoners and monitor its effects on the human body.
No study of this type is ever risk free, but the researchers have designed a protocol that they believe minimizes it for the prisoners. Because there can always be unexpected consequences, including illness or death, participants are offered special privileges during the testing period and possible reduction in their sentences after the conclusion of the study. Since, some of the prisoners consenting to be treated for a long period of time with higher doses of the chemical than the other participants, this group is offered full pardons at the conclusion of the study as an inducement to consent. The research group has proposed its study to those in charge of the prison and these administrators must decide whether to allow the study. If John Stuart Mill was presented with this study proposal what would he determine? That is, from his Utilitarian perspective, would Mill claim this program is moral? Use his ideas and evaluate this program from his perspective and note how he would advise the administrators.
Explanation:
the most serious flaw of this design is: <span>They have not defined happiness or how it will be measured.
Happiness is very subjective because it each person may have a different source of happiness. For some people, it maybe the success of their career while for the other it's simply doing what they love to do. Not only that, if Magali and Jane collect the data simply by asking like that, they would not know whether the person is telling the truth.</span>
Answer: Wilson's 14 points had done little to influence any future legislation, as congress had ultimately rejected most of his 14 points, while the Treaty of Versailles had also rejected most of these points. His most prominent of the 14 points, which was the League of Nations, had also been rejected completely. So, after the Treaty of Versailles, many of Wilson's 14 points were not used at all.
Explanation:
The information is not common knowledge and does not come from the book being reviewed.
Answer: Option C.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The additional information is the information that is added by the author of the paragraph. It is apart from the central idea or the message of the paragraph. It is not included in the central idea.
This additional information is not included in the central idea and needs to be cited from where did it come. It is not the normal or the common information or common knowledge. So it needs to be cited or written that where it did it come from.
Answer:A Surrendering Arms
Explanation:
