According to the socio-cognitive explanation of dissociative identity disorder, therapists have? Rewarded patients with attention and praise for revealing more and more personalities.
<h3>What is the social cognitive theory of dissociative identity disorder?</h3>
- The sociocognitive hypothesis of dissociative identity disorder (DID; formerly known as multiple personality disorder) contends that DID is a product of psychotherapy and the media rather than a legitimate psychiatric condition with a posttraumatic origin.
- CBT addresses these harmful thought patterns and swaps them out for ones grounded in the present. Additionally, CBT aids the individual in processing prior traumas and learning coping mechanisms for the depression that frequently accompanies DID.
- In order to safely remember and process traumatic experiences, build coping mechanisms, and, in the case of dissociative identity disorder, merge several identities into a single, useful individual are the objectives of treatment for dissociative disorders.
According to the socio-cognitive explanation of dissociative identity disorder, therapists have? Rewarded patients with attention and praise for revealing more and more personalities.
To learn more about socio-cognitive, refer to:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8711016/
#SPJ4
No clue to be honest with ya buddy
Answer:
It is so effective because it goes about how President George W. Bush's opponent, John Carey, went back and forth on supporting and opposing major wars and other issues that America faces.
That energy is not created nor destroyed it is only transferred
<span>The Supremacy Clause is a clause within Article VI of the U.S. Constitution which dictates that federal law is the "supreme law of the land". This means that judges in every state must follow the Constitution, laws, and treatises of the federal government in matters which are directly or indirectly within the government's control. Under the doctrine of preemption, which is based on the Supremacy Clause, federal law preempts state law, even when the laws conflict. Thus, a federal court may require a state to stop certain behavior it believes interferes with, or is in conflict with, federal law.</span>