Ok, so based on a survey - you know that out of 30 students, 11 said that their favourite subject is mathematics. :-)
This means that:
11/30 of these students think mathematics if their favourite subject.
Now, in order to answer your question, we are going to have to change the denominator of the fraction above to 1000. Whatever we do to the denominator of this fraction, we must do to the numerator of this fraction.
Example:
This means that rounded to the nearest ten, theoretically speaking, 370 students out of 1000 would say that mathematics is their favourite subject.
<span>The logic in the sequence is --> +2, +2, +3, +3, +4, +4, +5, +5, +6, +6 and so on...
So, </span><span>the next number in the sequence would be 24+5 = 29
So, the answer is --> c.29
</span>
Width of the reactangle = 38 cm
Minimum perimeter = 692 cm
Let the length of the rectangle be x cm
We know that,
Perimeter of rectangle = 2 * (length + width)
Since the perimeter should be atleast 692 cm. Therefore,
2 * (x + 38) > 692
2x + 76 > 692
2x > 692 - 76
2x > 616
x > 
x > 308
Hence, the length of the rectangle should be more that 308 cms.
9514 1404 393
Explanation:
The three Reasons tell you what to look for to put in the Statement blank.
1. We are given that RE = 2AR and RT = 2GR.
2. The only vertical angles in the figure are ...
∠GRA ≅ ∠TRE
3. Using the given relation between the sides, we can write the proportion ...
RE/RA = RT/RG = 2
It is nice, though maybe not absolutely essential, to write the segment names in order of corresponding vertices.
4. Having shown that two sides are proportional and the angle between them is congruent, we can claim similarity using the SAS Theorem.
Answer:
0.5.15
Step-by-step explanation:
im not sure if its right sorry