I strongly believe the defendents of George Floyd's case should be tried seperatrely. It would be extremely unwise to have them tried them together. If merely two white men together have the ability to murder someone and (<em>almost</em>) get away with it, then together in court they could do far worse. White supremecy is unjust and segregated. In court, every detail matters, as it will affect the defendent's outcome. By allowing white supremecy to get the upper hand by doubling it (this by having two defendents), the facts will be shifted and altered tremendously to support the side of the defendent, and the defendents' outcome will be unjustified.
Hope this helps!
I love writing stuff like this, it feels good. Plus, this took me like 5 minutes :P
Answer:
The answer is "A". Injury and Causation.
Explanation:
Answer:
The coroner may order a post-mortem examination to determine the cause, identification of the remains, document injuries, and to assist in determining the manner of death. A coroner usually orders a forensic autopsy if foul play is suspected.
Explanation:
The 24- 48 window is a good time for everything to still be the same it was after the incident therefore no more further injuries could happen and everything is still "fresh".
