1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Citrus2011 [14]
2 years ago
8

Sanitation rules are established by:

Law
1 answer:
ioda2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The answer is probably C because I looked it up on the internet.

You might be interested in
you are performing a regular inventory of the controlled substances in the pharmacy. you discover a minor inventory discrepancy.
emmainna [20.7K]
Follow your pharmacys procedures.
6 0
3 years ago
Following a vote on a bill in the Arizona State Senate, which of the following scenarios will likely take place? ( I know B is i
pogonyaev

Answer:

The correct answer is A.

3 0
2 years ago
What does "separation of powers" mean? (3 points) Group of answer choices Government is divided into three branches. People are
cricket20 [7]

The correct answer is Government is divided into three branches.

Explanation:

The separation of powers implies political power is held by different institutions or branches of government. This prevents power is held by only one person or institution as it occurs in totalitarian monarchies or dictatorships, and therefore there is no abuse of power.

In the U.S. and other democratic systems, this separation of power occurs through branches (legislative, judicial, executive) and each of the branches control the actions of others. According to this, the correct answer is the government is divided into three branches.

6 0
3 years ago
IM GIVING 100PTS & BRAINLIEST! AND GONNA POST 2 QUESTIONS SPECIFICALLY FOR YOU TO ANSWER AND GET 200PTS FOR THOSE (ILL GIVE
kolezko [41]

Answer:

Mr. President:

I confess that I do not entirely approve of this Constitution at present, but Sir, I am not sure I shall never approve it: For having lived long, I have experienced many Instances of being oblig'd, by better Information or fuller Consideration, to change Opinions even on important Subjects, which I once thought right, but found to be otherwise. It is therefore that the older I grow the more apt I am to doubt my own Judgment, and to pay more Respect to the Judgment of others. Most Men indeed as well as most Sects in Religion, think themselves in Possession of all Truth, and that wherever others differ from them it is so far Error. Steele, a Protestant in a Dedication tells the Pope, that the only Difference between our two Churches in their Opinions of the Certainty of their Doctrine, is, the Romish Church is infallible, and the Church of England is never in the Wrong. But tho' many private Persons think almost as highly of their own Infallibility, as of that of their Sect, few express it so naturally as a certain French Lady, who in a little Dispute with her Sister, said, I don't know how it happens, Sister, but I meet with no body but myself that's always in the right. Il n'y a que moi qui a toujours raison.

In these Sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Constitution, with all its Faults, if they are such; because I think a General Government necessary for us, and there is no Form of Government but what may be a Blessing to the People if well administered; and I believe farther that this is likely to be well administered for a Course of Years, and can only end in Despotism as other Forms have done before it, when the People shall become so corrupted as to need Despotic Government, being incapable of any other.

I doubt too whether any other Convention we can obtain, may be able to make a better Constitution: For when you assemble a Number of Men to have the Advantage of their joint Wisdom, you inevitably assemble with those Men all their Prejudices, their Passions, their Errors of Opinion, their local Interests, and their selfish Views. From such an Assembly can a perfect Production be expected? It therefore astonishes me, Sir, to find this System approaching so near to Perfection as it does; and I think it will astonish our Enemies, who are waiting with Confidence to hear that our Councils are confounded, like those of the Builders of Babel, and that our States are on the Point of Separation, only to meet hereafter for the Purpose of cutting one another's throats. Thus I consent, Sir, to this Constitution because I expect no better, and because I am not sure that it is not the best.

The Opinions I have had of its Errors, I sacrifice to the Public Good. I have never whispered a Syllable of them abroad. Within these Walls they were born, and here they shall die. If every one of us in returning to our Constituents were to report the Objections he has had to it, and use his Influence to gain Partisan in support of them, we might prevent its being generally received, and thereby lose all the salutary Effects and great Advantages resulting naturally in our favour among foreign Nations, as well as among ourselves, from our real or apparent Unanimity. Much of the Strength and Efficiency of any Government, in procuring and securing Happiness to the People depends on Opinion, on the general Opinion of the Goodness of that Government as well as of the Wisdom and Integrity of its Governors. I hope therefore that for our own Sakes, as a Part of the People, and for the sake of our Posterity, we shall act heartily and unanimously in recommending this Constitution, wherever our Influence may extend, and turn our future Thoughts and Endeavours to the Means of having it well administered.

On the whole, Sir, I cannot help expressing a Wish, that every Member of the Convention, who may still have Objections to it, would with me on this Occasion doubt a little of his own Infallibility, and to make manifest our Unanimity, put his Name to this instrument.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the excerpt from the Supreme Court’s ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson. . . . requiring the officer of the passenger train to as
Marat540 [252]

Answer:

The Brown case addresses whether public institutions can legally be divided by race.

Explanation:

Brown v. Board of Education was a US Supreme Court decision that declared the separation between black and white students in public schools unconstitutional. While this was definitely the case in Brown, the NAACP (National Association for the Progress of the Black Population), founded on February 12, 1909, had been campaigning against racial segregation in the United States for nearly twenty years.

The Brown v. Board of Education may be related to the paragraph shown in the above question, which reports on passenger separation to the bus or compartment designated for the race to which it belongs, because both cases report on the separation of individuals into groups.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How does the bill of rights protect individuals civil liberties
    13·1 answer
  • Are Dual agencies are illegal in some states
    15·1 answer
  • Which government entity is the part of our checks and balances system that decides whether a law is within the guidelines of the
    14·2 answers
  • You guys can have these points​
    9·1 answer
  • Most homicides involve victims who are ______ and offenders who are _______
    7·1 answer
  • Three roles of the local government in development​
    9·1 answer
  • senate bill 819 establishes procedure by which district attorney and incarcerated person may jointly petition sentencing court f
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about common law are not true? (Select all that apply.)
    5·1 answer
  • greg discovered that his yard contained a vein of silver running through it. greg managed to mine some of the ore and sell it to
    13·1 answer
  • how does he answer that claim what does his response tell you about the framers intentions regarding the institutional design of
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!