The best option among the choices provided that has a significantly higher possibility of being hired in a position at Human Resources would be <span>Michelle, who studied psychology and physiology." It would be a great advantage of Michelle to settle on the job since she already has an adequate understanding of people's emotions.</span>
Answer:
The Cash paid to suppliers was $85,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Cost of goods sold = $100,000
Decrease in inventory = $5,000
Increase in accounts payable = $10,000
Now,
Cash paid to suppliers will be
= Cost of goods sold - Decrease in inventory - Increase in accounts payable
= $100,000 - $5,000 - $10,000
= $85,000
Hence,
The Cash paid to suppliers was $85,000
Answer:
Option A is correct
Firms have different costs.
Explanation:
Option A is correct
Long run supply curve is upward sloping or constant horizontal line depends on the industry whether it is variable cost industry (increasing production cost) or a constant cost industry respectively. Option A is correct because if firms have different production cost and it is increasing as the output is increasing then it is upward Sloping long-run supply curve.
The following policy that prevents employees from being able to tamper with security settings by limiting the time they spend checking those settings is about is <u>Job Rotation,</u> this limits the amount of time that people can tamper with security settings
<h3>What is job rotation?</h3>
It is the process in which a worker leaves his position and this must be replaced by another. In other words, any exit or entry of a collaborator in the company generates a rotation movement. There are even different types of job rotation:
- Involuntary
- Volunteer
- Desirable
- Undesirable
For more about Job rotation here brainly.com/question/29833716
#SPJ4
<u></u>
<u></u>
Answer:
The differences between US GAAP and IFRS pose an extra cost because international corporations must prepare two separate accounting statements. But besides that, other potential risks include paying higher taxes than what the companies should pay int their home countries and the uncertainty generated by changing rules.
Not only do current tax rates affect potential investments, e.g. currently companies in the US pay relatively low corporate taxes (Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017) but these benefits end on 2025. But also different methods for valuating physical assets and R&D costs can represent higher than expected taxes. E.g. depending on a company's needs, it may be beneficial to expense all R&D costs right away, or maybe it would be better to capitalize some of them after technical feasibility is achieved (IFRS).
The main advantage of having uniform rules (e.g. UCC) is that all the companies know exactly what to expect and how to act. Certainty decreases risk, and less risk reduces costs.
Explanation:
In the US, the vast majority of firms use US GAAP as their accounting method, but around the world the IFRS method is used.
Physical asset valuation is the process of determining the value of your physical assets including P, P & E, and also inventories.
- When valuing inventories IFRS uses FIFO, while US GAAP allows FIFO, LIFO or weighted average costing methods. US GAAP also values inventory at lesser of cost or market value, while IFRS values inventory at lesser of cost or net realizable value.
- US GAAP uses the cost method to determine the historic cost of an asset, while IFRS uses basically the same method but does not include all the costs of location of the assets (e.g. cost of removing or clearing a facility).
- US GAAP recognizes non-monetary exchanges while IFRS doesn't.
- IFRS also allows the cost of asset to be revalued, which can result in unrealized gains or losses. The US GAAP only considers historic costs.
- There are also other minor differences regarding depreciation, disposals and impairment rules.
Research and development must be expensed right away under US GAAP, while IFRS basically requires the same, it allows some capitalization of development expenditures if certain criteria is met (technical feasibility is achieved).
